" A wealth of information..."

"1169 And Counting is a wealth of information on our Republican past and present , and demonstrates how the Irish political landscape , like that of any nation, will never be a black and white issue..."
(From the ‘e-Thursday’ section of the ‘Business Week’ supplement of the ‘Irish Independent’ , 21st August 2008.)

Thursday, June 06, 2013

ROBERT EMMET'S GRAVE : 'OLD THEORY' RESURFACES.....










Funeral arrangements : Reposing at Smyth’s Funeral Home, Roscommon on Friday 7th June from 5.30pm to 8.00pm followed by Removal to the Sacred Heart Church. Requiem Mass on Saturday at 11.30am with Burial afterwards in St. Coman’s Cemetery. Family Flowers only. House private Saturday morning. Donations, if desired, to CABHAIR (Irish Republican Prisoners’ Dependants Fund), 223 Parnell St., Dublin 1 and to the Roscommon-Mayo Hospice.

Please note that a bus will be leaving Dublin at 8.45am for the funeral from 223 Parnell Street on Saturday 8th June 2013 ; please telephone 01 8729747 to inquire re same.


'THERE WILL BE ANOTHER DAY.....' By Peadar O'Donnell ; first published in January 1963.

It was one o' clock in the morning when Bertie Smyllie phoned me ; Hogan , who was in the country all day , called at the 'Irish Times' office on his way home, to give me an appointment for that afternoon , and I was encouraged that he seemed eager to discuss terms with me. When I was shown into Hogan's office I was taken aback that he should ask me sharply whether Smyllie had not telephoned me. I shut the door with my shoulders and leaned against it , for a moment, and told him nobody 'phoned me. He said he asked Smyllie to 'phone me to save me the embarrassment of coming to him , for he could make no terms with me.

Every government supporter in County Donegal , it seemed, was on the 'phone to Dublin to report that the Movement had collapsed , and that Peadar O' Donnell had dare not show his face there any more. To make terms with him now would be to give him more power for mischief and, since nothing was to be gained, there was nothing to lose - we played hard knuckles for a while , and I named persons I was certain were among those who telephoned the Minister and I mocked at them as witnesses to anything more complicated than the rumble of wind in their own guts. He gave me a few etchings of myself. He was good.

It was our first, and it turned out to be our only meeting and, as we talked, a strange thing happened to me : it was the sort of experience an author enjoys at some stage or other in any reasonably good book , when the material which excites his mind becomes a self-lit in such a way as to take on the brilliance of a vision. I think it is likely that there are many communications between a man and his environment which remain suspended below the level of consciousness until some flick of unusual excitement touches them off , and they then give him a vision in depth. Anyway , I was startled..... (MORE LATER).


THE BETRAYAL OF 1916 -



- REVISIONISM EXPOSED.....

From 'IRIS' magazine, Easter 1991.

By Martin Spain.

The ships of the British Empire , carrying merchants , soldiers , bureaucrats and missionaries , brought with them an alien civilisation and religion and took cheap labour and raw materials. They also brought the military hardware to enforce this raw deal and those who took up arms against such domination then , as those who employ the same tactics today , are denigrated as narrow-minded and anti-democratic militarists (they certainly are labeled as such , and worse, by those who left their ranks for comfortable and richer prospects ; one example here!) . The entirely anti-democratic nature of an Ireland under British rule is not to be considered when castigating the men and women of 1916 , as with Oglaigh na hEireann today , for having "no mandate" ; the whole argument as to 'mandates' is one which the revisionists are very fond of , as they reduce 'democracy' to the concept of 'majority rule'. The undemocratic imposition of partition they accept as a fait accompli , while at the same time the in-built unionist majority in the Six Counties is also accepted as a 'reasonable democratic' block on Irish unity.

Revisionists have no problem accepting the argument that there can be no Irish unity until 'the people of the Six Counties will it' : that the concept of democracy is as much about protecting the rights of minorities as guaranteeing a permanent sectarian statelet against the wishes of 40% of the people of the Six Counties is rejected in this context in favour of majority rule, because in this situation it suits them to take this line.

Likewise , 1916 is attacked because nobody went out beforehand and received a 51% majority in an election in favour of such a tactic. But the Easter Rising took place in a country under foreign occupation , and few would argue that most Irish people didn't desire freedom. The continuing support for the 'Irish Parliamentary Party' up to 1914 and the willingness of so many to fight another country's war in the killing fields of Flanders in the hope that this sacrifice would result in the granting of Home Rule is evidence enough of that aspiration. The role of the vanguard in any revolution has, by necessity, been a minority pursuit. (MORE LATER).


ROBERT EMMET'S GRAVE : 'OLD THEORY' RESURFACES.....

Thomas Kent , 1916 Rebel and, below, Robert Emmet,1803 Rebel.

This newspaper article , regarding the body of Thomas Kent , caught not only my attention but that of one of our readers , who contacted us in relation to a similar story, concerning the unknown final resting place of Robert Emmet.

Various graveyards and vaults have been suggested re Emmet's grave - that his remains were buried in Bully's Acre ("....near the right-hand corner of the burying ground, next the avenue of the Royal Hospital, close to the wall, and at no great distance from the former entrance, which is now built up...") ....a nearby unofficial popular burial place in the grounds of the Royal Hospital Kilmainham....that he was reinterred in St Michan's, a church with strong United Irish associations (in whose vaults lie the remains of the Sheares brothers) ....St Anne's in Dawson Street.....(the old)Glasnevin Churchyard.....the vault in the Church of Ireland St Peter's Church in Aungier Street.....St Paul's Church, North King Street ,and in a graveyard in County Kerry.

Our reader sent us some documents which he was given years ago by his grandfather , and which make for very interesting reading , and add to the mystery : the grandfather in question was given the documents by Joe Doolan , a 1916 man , and our reader introduced those documents to us with this foreword : " Joe Doolan worked in St James Hospital with some fellow 1916 Veterans.Their employment was part of a tradition where the Government assured veterans were given these jobs because of their role in the 1916 Rising. Joe fought under Major John McBride. The story is written on the back of Civil Service paper, and this paper was used to record the daily inspections of locations where rodent control measures were in place.

My Grandfather was a young lad during the Easter rising. He recalls when on an occasion of a parade, he was dressed in an Irish Kilt and walked in the parade. He hand was held during the length of the parade by none other than Maud Gonne, and under his kilt was hidden a gun. The gun was removed when they arrived at the other end of the parade. He became fully active in the 1920s, when he and others would go around Dublin and beyond, going into pubs and smashing them up if they were selling British alcohol, and hold up coal merchants selling British coal, and forcing them to throw the coal into the Liffey. There were times when they would not throw the coal into the Liffey if the merchants agreed to move guns around the city for them. I have no knowledge of the relationship between Joe Doolan and my grandfather. Joe had told the story of Robert Emmet on a number of occasions, he said he would write it down some time , which he did. He gave it to my grandfather and it was put away for years. In the late 1980s my grandfather called me aside and handed me a battered brown envelope. Inside that envelope was the hand written story of the last resting place of Robert Emmet. I have that document safely put away...."

Our friend sent us five pages , the first of which he designed himself as a 'cover' for the other four pages , which are , as stated, hand-written by Joe Doolan :

Page 1 (cover) , of 5 - the other four pages were written by Joe Doolan on 9th May , 1966.

Page 2 : "...who was the person most likely to take any interest in Emmet's last resting place ? There is but one answer to that question : Sarah Curran....when Emmet was being conveyed to his place of execution in Thomas Street , Dublin , while the procession was passing along the South Quays, a carriage with a lady in it , a lone figure draped in black, driving along the North Quays in the opposite direction stopped....the lady waved her handkerchief in the direction of Emmet....he saw the gesture and waved his hand in reply but was rudely stopped by his jailers....."

Page 3 : "...on the day of Emmet's execution , Sarah Curran was away from home from early morning until late in the evening. On her way home, she delayed in the village of Rathfarnham in order to interview a man (Keogh?) , a carter by occupation , with his own cart and horse....on the following morning, very early, he came to the gate of the Priory with the remains of Emmet covered with sacking. Sarah Curran met him and asked him to bury the remains....."

Page 4 : "...the two men were on duty in the Rathfarnham district and while there went in for a drink to Farrington's public house.....they engaged in conversation.....and he said, very positively - 'Emmet is buried within 50 yards of where you stand.....' "

Page 5 : "...an arrangement was made between Robert Emmet and Sarah Curran in which the survivor pledged his or her word and honour to have the deceased buried in or near the grave of Gertrude Curran in the Priory grounds, this arrangement was made shortly before Emmet's insurrection....when in the graveyard they found the grave described, beside the walk, with a tree at the foot and another at the head...."

Intriguing , no doubt, and all the more so considering that this information was wrote 47 years ago , but... "....In this district nearly every ancient site is associated in tradition with either Sarah Curran or Robert Emmet and it is not surprising therefore to find that this burial place has been suggested as the last resting place of Robert Emmet. This tradition goes back for well over a century and it is rather surprising that this site was not investigated when the search for Emmet's remains was being made at places a great deal less accessible and no less improbable.

In October 1979 the opportunity offered itself to carry out this investigation. The Priory estate was being developed and heavy machinery moved in to lay the roads and sewers. A Mrs. Bernadette Foley of nearby Barton Drive drew attention to the need to carry out this work before the site was buried for ever under a concrete jungle. With the co-operation of Messrs Gallaghers, the developers, a small group undertook to investigate the site. First the exact location was checked on the original large scale manuscript map in the O.S., next the field was carefully chained and the site marked to within a few feet and then a narrow trench 3 feet (0.91 m) deep was dug through where the burial should have been. The result was a complete blank. A second and a third trench were cut at intervals until a large area had been investigated without finding any burial, timber, brick or stone.

The developers then offered to investigate further with the excavator and carefully cleared an area of 20 yd (18 m) long and 10 yd (9.1 m) wide to a depth of 4 feet (1.2 m) without finding any sign of disturbance. They then deepened this area by another two feet with no better result. All the accounts of the burial state that it was made in a vault and it is therefore surprising and disappointing that no evidence whatever was found and there does not seem to be any obvious explanation for it. The builders, Messrs Gallaghers Ltd. were commended for their interest in this aspect of the site and their painstaking excavation work under the supervision of Mr. Leslie Black was expertly carried out...."
(from here.)

And we can only presume that "...in or near.." was adequately encompassed in the searches that were done....?


BELFAST PICKET IN SUPPORT OF MARTIN COREY , 14TH JUNE 2013.

Interned by the British since April 2010 , no warning , no 'court' case , no reason....

Although I am loathe to ask people to do that which I am unable to do myself (I won't be in Ireland on that date) , I'm doing just that now : if you can make it to this event , please do so and , if you are unable to attend , please highlight it on your blog or 'Facebook' page etc. It literally could be any one of us the next time....


JAMES CONNOLLY : BORN ON 5TH JUNE 1868.

An Irish Rebel : James Connolly , 1868 - 1916.

Although we have practically an endless supply of information on James Connolly available to us , after much deliberation we decided to re-publish an article that John , from this parish, authored a few years ago, on the basis that 'if it ain't broke , don't fix it !' (...that , and the fact that I have a suitcase that needs packing!) .

James Connolly was born on June 5, 1868, at 107, the Cowgate, Edinburgh. His parents, John and Mary Connolly, had emigrated to Edinburgh from County Monaghan in the 1850s. His father worked as a manure carter, removing dung from the streets at night, and his mother was a domestic servant who suffered from chronic bronchitis and was to die young from that ailment.

Anti-Irish feeling at the time was so bad that Irish people were forced to live in the slums of the Cowgate and the Grassmarket which became known as 'Little Ireland'. Overcrowding, poverty, disease, drunkenness and unemployment were rife -- the only jobs available was selling second-hand clothes and working as a porter or a carter. James Connolly went to St Patricks School in the Cowgate, as did his two older brothers, Thomas and John. At ten years of age, James left school and got a job with Edinburgh's 'Evening News' newspaper, where he worked as a 'Devil', cleaning inky rollers and fetching beer and food for the adult workers. His brother Thomas also worked with the same newspaper. In 1882, aged 14, he joined the British Army in which he was to remain for nearly seven years, all of it in Ireland, where he witnessed first hand the terrible treatment of the Irish people at the hands of the British. The mistreatment of the Irish by the British and the landlords led to Connolly forming an intense hatred of the British Army.

While serving in Ireland, he met his future wife, a Protestant named Lillie Reynolds. They were engaged in 1888 and in the following years Connolly discharged himself from the British Army and went back to Scotland. In 1890, he and Lillie Reynolds were wed in Perth. In the Spring of 1890, James and Lillie moved to Edinburgh and lived at 22 West Port, and joined his father and brother working as labourers and then as a manure carter with Edinburgh Corporation, on a strictly temporary and casual basis. He became active in Socialist and trade union circles and became secretary of the Scottish Socialist Federation, almost by mistake. At the time his brother John was secretary; however, after John spoke at a rally in favour of the eight-hour day he was fired from his job with the corporation, so while he looked for work, James took over as secretary. During this time, Connolly became involved with the Independent Labour Party which Kerr Hardie formed in 1893.

Cobbler's Shop :

In late 1894, Connolly lost his job with the corporation. He opened a cobblers shop in February 1895 at number 73 Bucclevch Street, a business venture which was not successful. At the invitation of the Scottish Socialist, John Leslie, he came to Dublin in May 1896 as paid organiser of the Dublin Socialist Society for £1 a week. James and Lillie Connolly and their three daughters, Nora, Mona and Aideen set sail for Dublin in 1896, where he founded the Irish Socialist Republican Party in May of 1896. In 1898, Connolly had to return to Scotland on a lecture and fund-raising tour. Before he left Ireland, he had founded The Workers' Republic newspaper, the first Irish Socialist paper, from his house at number 54 Pimlico, where he lived with his wife and three daughters. Six other families, a total of 30 people, also lived in number 54 Pimlico, at the same time!

In 1902, he went on a five month lecture tour of the USA and, on returning to Dublin he found the ISRP existed in name only. He returned to Edinburgh where he worked for the Scottish District of the Social Democratic federation. He then chaired the inaugural meeting of the Socialist Labour Party in 1903 but, when his party failed to make any headway, Connolly became disillusioned and in September 1903, he emigrated to the US and did not return until July 1910. In the US, he founded the Irish Socialist Federation in New York, and another newspaper, The Harp. In 1910, he returned to Ireland and in June of the following year he became Belfast organiser for James Larkin's Irish Transport and General Workers Union. In 1913 he co-founded the Labour Party and in 1914 he organised, with James Larkin, opposition to the Employers Federation in the Great Lock-Out of workers that August. Larkin travelled to the USA for a lecture tour in late 1914 and James Connolly became the key figure in the Irish Labour movement.

Irish Citizen Army :

The previous year, 1913, had also seen Connolly co-found the Irish Citizen Army, at Liberty Hall, the headquarters of the ITGWU. This organisation, the ICA, was established to defend the rights of the working people. In October 1914, Connolly returned permanently to Dublin and revived the newspaper The Workers' Republic that December following the suppression of his other newspaper, The Irish Worker. In The Workers' Republic newspaper, Connolly published articles on guerrilla warfare and continuously attacked the group known as The Irish Volunteers for their inactivity. This group refused to allow the Irish Citizen Army to have any in-put on its Provisional Committee and had no plans in motion for armed action. The Irish Volunteers were by this time approximately 180,000 strong and were urged by their leadership to support England in the war against Germany. It should be noted that half of the Provisional Committee of the Irish Volunteers were John Redmonds people, who was the leader of the Irish Parliamentary Party. The Irish Volunteers split, with the majority siding with Redmond and becoming known as the National Volunteers -- approximately 11,000 of the membership refused to join Redmond and his people.

However, in February 1915, The Workers' Republic newspaper was suppressed by the Dublin Castle authorities. Even still, Connolly grew more militant. In January 1916, the Irish Republican Brotherhood had become alarmed by Connolly's ICA manoeuvres in Dublin and at Connolly's impatience at the apparent lack of preparations for a rising, and the IRB decided to take James Connolly into their confidence. During the following months, he took part in the preparation for a rising and was appointed Military Commander of the Republican Forces in Dublin, including his own Irish Citizen Army. He was in command of the Republican HQ at the GPO during Easter Week, and was severely wounded. He was arrested and court-martialled following the surrender. On May 9, 1916, James Connolly was propped up in bed before a court-martial and sentenced to die by firing squad -- he was at that time being held in the military hospital in Dublin Castle. In a leading article in the Irish Independent on May 10, William Martin Murphy, who had led the employers in the Great Lock-out of workers in 1913, urged the British Government to execute Connolly.

At dawn on May 12, 1916, James Connolly was taken by ambulance from Dublin Castle to Kilmainham Jail, carried on a stretcher into the prison yard, strapped into a chair in a corner of the yard and executed by firing- squad. Connolly's body, like that of the other 14 executed leaders, was taken to the British military cemetery adjoining Arbour Hill Prison and buried, without coffin in a mass quicklime grave. The fact that he was one of the seven signatories of the 1916 Proclamation bears evidence of his influence.

As a post script, and on a personal level, I will quote James Connolly's words to the Irish Citizen Army on 16 April, 1916 :
"The odds are a thousand to one against us, but in the event of victory, hold onto your rifles, as those with whom we are fighting may stop before our goal is reached." To those people whom Republican Sinn Féin would consider having "stopped before the goal is reached", I point out that the fact that James Connolly died on a chair should not be seen to infer that he wanted that chair placed at a table where a compromise would be the outcome.

Had James Connolly being willing to accept a compromise , he could more than likely have become a paid patsy in Ireland for Westminster but political principles meant something then , and still do today , to some people.


DONCASTER BELLES ARSing AROUND AS CABHAIR TAKE THE LEAD !

Ah flip it anyway : one last job before we belles take on everything that NYC wants to throw at us...!

On Sunday afternoon coming (9th June 2013) , myself and one team (from CABHAIR) will be doing battle in the 'Hotel Raffle' with supporters of Brazil , France , Cork , Shamrock Rovers , Chelsea , Everton and the aforementioned Doncaster Belles and Arsenal teams at the monthly raffle and then , a few short hours after we win (!) , myself and a different team will be 'doing battle' in Dublin Airport to make certain that we board our flight to New York City , for our two-week holiday , as previously mentioned.

I won't have time to do the usual raffle report here (...as I'll be over there!) and it will be 'old news' by the time I get around to posting it : we don't expect to be updating the blog until late June or maybe even early July. This is the first break we have had since June 2011 and, considering it's taking place in New York, we know we're going to need time to recover after we get back !

Thanks for reading, Sharon.






Wednesday, June 05, 2013








PETER ROGER CASEMENT BRADY / RUAIRÍ Ó BRÁDAIGH - BORN 2ND OCTOBER 1932 , DIED 5TH JUNE 2013. REST IN PEACE , A CHARA.

Ar dheis Dé go raibh a anam dilis.

Irish Republicanism lost a Founding Father today , Wednesday , 5th June 2013. I knew the man very well for the last two decades and , as with his comrade Dáithí Ó Conaill , I had the highest regard for him. My deepest sympathy to his family and to his political family.

Ruairí's principles shine through in these two articles and the light he leaves behind will continue to shine on the true Irish Republican path ; it's not the smooth journey that others prefer but it's a path which guarantees that the destination will be reached. And we will remember Ruairí and his comrade Dáithí , amongst others, when we get there.

RIP.

(Our usual Wednesday post will follow later.)






Wednesday, May 29, 2013

GAME SET AND 'MATCH' FOR A SENSE OF SELF-ENTITLEMENT.

'THERE WILL BE ANOTHER DAY.....' By Peadar O'Donnell ; first published in January 1963.

Black James sat there and nodded to himself as if finding in his own thoughts, even now, approval of what he had done. "And what did he say, James ? " , I asked, and for once I found words as hard to get as James. "Tut tut, James' , he said , tut tut..." I threw back my head and roared, but James was not at the end of his story : "....we had a drink together , like always, and when I was going he said something and what he said was this - 'Seasaigídh le chéile, James , let you stand together. Don't one do one thing and one another'. And James looked around at us all.

The mood of a movement is strange and , on occasion , unpredictable. One day it will withstand an impact that should shake it to its roots and on another day it will scare itself to pieces at a whisper that should not take a chip out of it but one thing is certain - once it loses momentum , the maggots get to work on it. I do not know , to this day, what took the heart out of the committee , but the agitation just stalled. The jailings had a part in it , and so had the death of Big Nial Houston - a great part. Maybe I stayed too much in Dublin. One morning I got a letter , curt and direct, instructing me to go to Paddy Hogan and make the best terms I could, for such was the decision of the committee. Phil McCauley did not add a word to it.

I hurried round to Bertie Smyllie , Editor of 'The Irish Times' , at his home , and he came down to see me in his dressing-gown : when will somebody adequately acknowledge Smyllie's warm response to the many demands Republicans made on him ? I asked him to arrange an interview for me with Paddy Hogan and I gave him a note of my terms to forward to the man - 'Release the prisoners / Forgive the court charges / Freeze the arrears'. I will then undertake that every tenant in the townlands will pay his current annuity * . When I got home I found a telegram awaiting me , which merely summarised the morning's letter - the committee was obviously afraid the letter might not have reached me by that morning's post. I was greatly upset to get the telegram , for I knew that although the post office was administered by two charming old-world ladies , it was wide open to one of the most hostile of the government supporters in the village - hostile to me and with some reason. That was one of the troubles , the robustness of the personal enmity I drew on myself. Word of this telegram would go whooping over the telephones of the county and our position would be greatly weakened by it. (* A sell-out, in my opinion , which is why , although strongly guided by the principles and policies of RSF - with which I have never yet been disappointed - I adhere to my own value system first and foremost , regardless of whether or not I have the backing/support of an organisation behind me.) (MORE LATER).


THE BETRAYAL OF 1916 -



- REVISIONISM EXPOSED.....

From 'IRIS' magazine, Easter 1991.

By Martin Spain.

However , the military struggle of Irish republicans is not born out of a colonising past but rather from resistance to colonisation (nicely expressed here by the political party that the author , Martin Spain, supported at the time he wrote that sentence!) . The moral high ground which Britain today increasingly claims in the Six Counties , as 'an honest broker keeping the two warring factions apart' , stands in stark contrast to the jingoistic pride with which colonial adventures in India and Afghanistan are proudly remembered and indeed how this latest bloody campaign in the Gulf is already being celebrated with patriotic feavour. Not for the vast majority of Britons moral dilemmas about the use of force (no , indeed - it is others that suffer that "moral dilemma" !).

In contrast, Irish people are expected by our home grown if Anglocentric revisionists to be ashamed of those men and women who took up arms against a massive military machine in 1916, and who fought, not for oil or territorial aggrandisment, but simply for an end to occupation and repression by Britain.

The English citizen's self-confidence in his or her nationality is not one which is commonly echoed in Ireland , despite the fact that military force as a tactic has been used here only as a last resort to achieve freedom for our people. The armed revolt which was 1916 was employed not to crush an opposing community but to strike a blow for freedom and equal rights for all, as even a peremptory glance at the 1916 Proclamation shows. Britain's bloody imperial past, meanwhile , is one of the slaughter of successive races of 'restless natives' the world over. (MORE LATER).


GAME SET AND MATCH* FOR A SENSE OF SELF-ENTITLEMENT. (*'Mandatory Alcohol Test Checkpoint'.)

'That's green behind me , but there's none in here...'

Just a flavour of political life here , for our many readers abroad : the man at the centre of this 'storm' (which he inflicted on himself) , Alan Shatter , is State minister for justice and is also in charge of the State army , but the fact that he holds those two posts does not excuse or explain his arrogance in attempting to (ab)use same for his own advantage. Such is the level of self-entitlement borne by Shatter and his colleagues in Leinster House that even if he were a lowly (!) back-bencher, he would still consider himself to be a breed apart from those of us who work for a living. People like that will never suffer , as they have insulated themselves from the everyday troubles that they happily inflict on those of us that pay their outrageous salaries and pensions, and have conviced themselves that they are worth it as they consider themselves to have 'done the State some service'. And, in a (perverse) way , they have , in that once again they have highlighted the fact that there is no difference between Fianna Fail , Fine Gael , Labour , Provisional Sinn Féin , the Green Party etc in that they are totally committed to using whatever time they are allowed in Leinster House to feather their own nests. Indeed , the only "green" on view is brought into the equation by those who vote for any of them !


THE ESTABLISHMENT "PROTECTING" ITSELF.....

From a full-colour PSF newsletter (made possible by Aengus , no doubt !) published by that party in the Clondalkin area of Dublin.

'(Provisional) Sinn Féin members protecting at the offices of Francis Fitzgerald TD (sic) and Robert Dowds TD (sic) for breaking their pre-election promises and introducing a tax on the family home' , as per the caption : and why wouldn't PSF seek to "protect" their Leinster House colleagues , as Mr Adams and Co. are guilty of the same offence ? Won't be long now until Fine Gael and Labour members and supporters are standing outside PSF offices with placards and banners to "protect" those inside from public anger. Stranger things have happened.....


SORT OF UNCOMMITTED. BUT MAYBE OPPOSED TO IT. OR NOT....

One thing is certain - they are not going to 'fall' on either side.

From 'not going to welcome it' to being delighted to publicise the distribution of leaflets in its favour (in the company of , no less, a leading member of a pro-British paramilitary gang!) : Provisional Sinn Féin have found themselves hoisted by their own petard , in that , as a 'revolutionary socialist' party they should be rallying their troops to oppose the G8 and what it stands for but, as a party now firmly ensconced in the 'establishment' that they once politically attacked , they are unable to do as they have given that same 'establishment' too many hostages to fortune which it can use against them and that 'revolutionary socialist' party is well aware that their 'friends and colleagues' in both Leinster House and Stormont would not hesitate to do so.

This sort of issue is very easy for Adams and the rest of the PSF leadership to 'fudge' as the majority of their members now consist of floating voters and/or ex-SDLP/Labour/Fianna Fail and other assorted 'nationalists', and that type have been 'reared' , politically , on a diet of such 'fudge'. And actually it would cost that Party dearly were it to commit itself to outright opposition (or support!) for the G8 , as some of its members would be in favour of the G8's of this world whilst others would be against. So best to try and play for both camps from its perch on the fence, whilst continuing to coin it in from both of the above-mentioned political institutions. A true 'party of government' in the making !


CUTBACKS IN STATE HEALTH SERVICE (IN CORK) DON'T JUST HURT THE UNAFFILIATED.

John Buttimer , Fine Gael elected representative in Cork , and cancer sufferer.

This poor man , only 41 years of age, is bravely fighting back against a killer illness and is doing so publicly : in January this year he spoke about how he discovered he was ill , despite feeling that he was in good overall health , and has been on some TV news programmes here in recent days in connection with his on-going battle against the illness , during which he (rightly) opined that 'no amount of money should be spared on research or treatment' where cancer is concerned.

Before his Party took office in Leinster House , Mr. Buttimer's brother , Jerry (also a Fine Gael rep) , was among the many who questioned and queried the approach outlined by Fianna Fail and the Green Party in relation to health cutbacks in his own electoral area and there is nothing to suggest that he won't do the same now that his own Party are attempting to further decrease the effectiveness of what remains of the health service in that part of Ireland. The fact that both are members of the same 'team' that are implementing the health cuts will , of course, have no bearing on how they now feel about cutbacks of that nature.....


USING STATE 'LAW'(/OMERTA) AGAINST THE STATE ?

Even the Mafia had , for the most part , a 'rule book' that they sometimes adhered to...

......although it's taken for granted that we're not dealing here with an organisation as 'honourable' as that.

The imposed ("extended") 'deadline' for paying the so-called 'property tax' was 8pm tonight , Wednesday 29th May 2013 , and not only did I not pay , but I have no intention of doing so, and have , like many others, tried to encourage those I came in contact with over the past few months not to pay , explaining the consequences involved in making that stand against the State. And that's a challenge that myself and hundreds of thousands of others are willing to fight , when the time comes.

There is some talk in anti-unjust tax circles of using the State Constitution as a means of defence against this tax , with particular reference to Article 40 ('5.The dwelling of every citizen is inviolable and shall not be forcibly entered save in accordance with law') and Article 43 ('The State acknowledges that man, in virtue of his rational being, has the natural right, antecedent to positive law, to the private ownership of external goods...the State accordingly guarantees to pass no law attempting to abolish the right of private ownership or the general right to transfer, bequeath, and inherit property...the State recognises, however, that the exercise of the rights mentioned in the foregoing provisions of this Article ought, in civil society, to be regulated by the principles of social justice...the State, accordingly, may as occasion requires delimit by law the exercise of the said rights with a view to reconciling their exercise with the exigencies of the common good') and , whilst I, for one, will simply not engage with what I regard to be a bastard illegitimate State (re its 'Irish Constitution') I can understand how others could view either or both of the above-mentioned Articles to be of some use to them in defending their position.

However , not meaning to put a damper on the campaign, it seems obvious to me that , should such a State Constitutional challenge arise, the suited gentry in Leinster House , with deep taxpayer-filled pockets, will hone in on the words '.....save in accordance with law' (Article 40) and the words '....to be regulated by the principles of social justice (and) delimit by law the exercise of the said rights with a view to reconciling their exercise with the exigencies of the common good' (Article 43) as their trump cards with which to 'prove their authority' in relation to this new tax. But it's a challenge worth taking by those that are so inclined but , as stated , I am not in that camp : I prefer to fight my corner , in this instance, on what I believe to be 'natural justice' rather than the fine and well-dressed weasel words allegedly supported by a political mafia. Either way , those bastards will not be filling their greasy coffers with any more of my already taxed take-home pay without a fight. I'll fight my own battles and will not be misled by those who, at first, appear to be 'on your side' ......

.....until push comes to shove, that is. Rely on your own convictions first , not on the stated 'convictions' of others.

Thanks for reading, Sharon.






Wednesday, May 22, 2013

"IMPOSSIBLE TO STUDY IRISH HISTORY WITHOUT GETTING A DISLIKE AND DISTRUST OF ENGLAND..."

'THERE WILL BE ANOTHER DAY.....' By Peadar O'Donnell ; first published in January 1963.

"Too bad" , he said , "too bad." He turned his back on me to look out the window. I told him the people were lifting sand and that they would raise the stones and bring them to the site and that all he would have to find were the timber and the slates. We sat down then and chatted over the problem together and not one word did he say of our talk of a few days before. Is it any wonder I should hate to be forced into a quarrel with such a man ?

Since the agitation began, I took care not to cross his path ; the way to keep priests out of politics is to leave them out when they are out. I was startled, therefore , to learn at the opening of a committee meeting that Black James Duirnin had been to see Father Scanlan on some aspect of our agitation. I was dumbfounded and more than a little uneasy and since what came of the interview might very well have some bearing on the matters before us, I asked Black James about it.

"I did, " Black James said , " I went to see Father Scanlan. Let me do right, let me do wrong, I went to see him. I went to him to complain about the bishop. The bishop had no right , no right at all, to come in here and talk as he talked , knowing as little as his talk showed he knew. What put it into my head to go to Father Scanlan was, thinking back in my bed one night on a thing that happened the time the Redemptorist Fathers gave the long mission. One of them had the people near out of their minds , the way he preached. Then, on a Sunday , with that Father Langley, the missioner, kneeling at the side of the alter waiting his turn to preach, and he a man without the Gaelic, our own priest looked down at him, in a way that was plain to see, and he leaned towards the people and he said under the shelter of our own tongue : " Ná tabhair barraidheacht áird air (Don't give too much heed to him)". I put Father Scanlan in mind of that and I said he should find some way to say a word now that would take the sting out of what the bishop said." (MORE LATER).


THE BETRAYAL OF 1916 -



- REVISIONISM EXPOSED.....

From 'IRIS' magazine, Easter 1991.

By Martin Spain.

The republican analysis is isolated and censored precisely because it points to the promises of the Proclamation of 1916 , to the far-sighted idealism of the men and women who fought for an Ireland not just free of English domination, but where "all the children of the nation would be cherished equally". The moral bankruptcy of the leaders of the 26-County State cannot but be exposed by a proper examination of what 1916 meant and its relevance to today.

Is there not something fundamentally unhealthy about a State which is reluctant to celebrate its own liberation struggle, only 75 years afterwards ? The 26-County State has its roots in the violence of 1916 and the Tan War - this is an indisputable fact , but what the revisionists argue is that the resort to armed struggle as a tactic was wrong then and by corollary is wrong now *. This means that Irish people must now feel somehow ashamed of their roots. Nineteen-sixteen and the Tan War are given less and less prominence in history textbooks in schools while the achievements of 'constitutional nationalists' like John Redmond are overemphasised.

Padraig Pearse commented on O'Connell , perhaps the greatest such leader, that he "...was a more effective political leader than either Lalor or Mitchel, but no one gives O'Connell a place in the history of political thought. He did not propound , he did not even attempt to propound , any body of political truths. He was a political strategist of extraordinary ability, a rhetorician of almost superhuman power. But we owe no political doctrine to O'Connell except the obviously untrue doctrine that liberty is too dearly purchased at the price of a single drop of blood. The political position of O'Connell....was not the statement of any national principle, the embodiment of any political truth - it was an able, though as it happened unsuccessful, strategic move." (* PSF have long since fell off that fence - and landed on the same side as those they once highlighted as hypocrites!) (MORE LATER).


WALK A MILE IN MY SHOES. Martin Corey Committee fund-raiser.

There will be a sponsored walk taking place in Dublin from Sandyford to Howth on Sunday 7th July 2013, leaving at 1pm, to raise much needed funds for the campaign. Martin Corey has been interned for over 3 years now without charge and needs as much support as we can give him. If you are presented with a sponsorship card please donate generously. More information on this injustice can be accessed here and, for 'Facebookers' , here.


A PRO-BRITISH UNIONIST WHO DEVELOPED "...A DISLIKE AND DISTRUST OF ENGLAND.."

Isabella Augusta Persse Gregory (Lady Gregory), 15th March 1852 – 22nd May 1932.

This fine woman was born in Roxborough House , near Loughrea in County Galway and was schooled at home by a Nanny , Mary Sheridan, who obviously passed-on her interest in Irish history to her pupil. At 28 years young, Isabella married 'Sir' William Henry Gregory , who 'owned' a large estate at Coole Park , near Gort, in County Galway , thus conveying on her the title 'Lady' : as a 'Lady of Leisure' who now found herself in the 'Big House' she availed of the large library and, when not reading, accompanied her husband on business trips throughout the world. Her education , the library and her foreign travels sparked within her a love of the written word , and she quickly became a published author.

Her husband died when she was 41 years of age but she continued to live in 'the Big House' , where her interest in all things Irish was nurtured , to the point that she practically converted the house into a 'retreat' for those who, like her, were smitten by Ireland and its troubled history - Edmund John Millington Synge , William Butler Yeats (and his brother , Jack, a well-known painter) , George Bernard Shaw (who described her as "the greatest living Irishwoman") and Sean O'Casey were amongst those who visited regularly and, indeed, she was believed to have had romantic connections with the poet Wilfrid Blunt and a New York lawyer , John Quinn. Despite her privileged lifestyle (or, indeed, perhaps due to it, as it afforded her the time to 'look within her soul') , Isabella Augusta Persse Gregory, who had a regular 'audience' with the 'Upper Class' of the day, loudly declared to all and sundry that it was "....impossible to study Irish history without getting a dislike and distrust of England..".

A 'poacher-turned-gamekeeper' but , unusual in our history, one who 'turned' the right way. She died in that 'Big House' on the 22nd May 1932 , at 80 years of age, and is fondly remembered by those of us who share her convictions and agree with her "impossible to study..." declaration. Incidentally , the 'Big House' scenario still exists in Ireland today , and continues to be a topic of heated conversation.


TWO NATIONALISTS , HAVING SOLD OUT , SPARRING OVER THE 'VALUE' OF THE PRICE RECEIVED.....



Fianna Fail's Micheál Martin and PSF's Gerry Adams : both trying to score points over an issue which both have long since washed their hands of.

Having long since sold-out on what they now both describe as 'the national question' , Fianna Fail and Provisional Sinn Féin , like all political poachers-turned-gamekeepers before them , in relation to the same issue, are not beyond 'playing the Green Card' when it suits them to do so. This exchange between the leaders of those two constitutional parties is an example of how that type of political snake oil salesman will attempt to use the on-going British occupation of six of our counties to present themselves as being concerned about the situation , even though both parties are on record as supporting the pro-British paramilitary gang they were discussing in their little showcase.

Indeed, Micheál Martin and Gerry Adams are aware that they are chasing the same type of voters and will take their 'showcase' out in public now and again (example here and here) , as neither of them have any shame when it comes to attempting to use such a serious issue to present themselves, and their parties, as 'republican orientated'. Voters of that particular type (ie watery nationalists) are extremely fickle and constantly shift their 'values' according to the latest photo-op and/or showcase speech and Messrs Martin and Adams are aware of this and will change course as often as necessary to keep them aboard. And to keep themselves in their present overpaid political careers.


TUPPENCE.....

....LOOKING DOWN ON WHAT IT CONSIDERS TO BE A HALFPENNY.

Although long overdue , and not frequent enough (and it has not received coverage in the mainstream media) it can't do any harm to have the plight of Irish republican political prisoners raised in the Leinster House arena , as happened this month (May 2013) during a discussion on the 15-years-dead Stormont Treaty ('GFA').

The Irish republican position in relation to 'Agreements' with Westminster remains as it always has , and rightly so : for any such 'Agreement' to have value it must contain a date for full British military and political withdrawal from Ireland. The 'Agreements' entered into by Leinster House since that institution was formed (with British weaponry and financial support) in 1922 - all of which were described, in one way or another, by their supporters, as 'stepping stones to freedom'- were soon discovered to be more akin to giant lily pads which , of course, are not 'foundation-building' material. And neither is the present Leinster House institution (or those institutionalised in it) but nice to know that it, and they, at least recognise that there are Irish republican political prisoners today and that the conflict didn't end in 1922 or 1998, as those well-suited 'gentlemen' (and women) would have you believe.


AUSTERITY ? WE'RE ALL IN IT* TOGETHER. SORT OF. (* by which we don't just mean potholes!)

Do your neighbourhood a favour : dispose of your domestic rubbish in a pothole!

While politicians boldly seek out 'new' ways to feather their own nests (Six Counties , Scotland , England) , the rest of us have been told that , in spite of the taxes that are stopped by them at source to 'maintain' , amongst other public services, the road infrastructure in this comical State, we will now have to have a 'whip round' on a door-to-door basis and supply the person-power and/or materials if we want a job like that done on our street !

The next such 'initiative' from that crowd will probably involve those in the neighbourhood doing a collection and organising the necessary equipment and labour etc to build a Berlin-type security wall around the taxpayer-stroked second house of one of those mentioned above after they 'fix' the wee problem they seem to be experiencing now in relation to that financial issue. And that's one 'fix' they will be able to manage, as it's in their own benefit to do so. And I wouldn't be surprised if people in the neighbourhood would do it, such is the amazing ability of what seems to be a majority to accept any amount of crap from those in the local 'Big House'. The spirit here is , for the most part , bruised but not yet broken.


'IDF'? - ALREADY IN USE. 'FSDF' MORE ACCURATE.

'Our boys' up for a bit of 'routing' :Irish Union Jackeens are proud to be 'closer than you think' to British imperialist forces. Talk about sucking-up to the local bully....

"It’s been a pleasure.We are closer than people think" - the words of Free State Army Sergeant Gerry Setright , delighted to be of service to the Crown in Mali. And by the way , Gerry , your 'closeness' to British soldiers does not surprise Irish republicans, who have always been aware of just how 'close' you and your ilk are to Westminster. Sure didn't that kip give birth to ya and, like any good offspring, you will be forever grateful. Blood is thicker than water , after all.


WE ARE ONE....

We are 'One' , according to a 'Eurovision' Committee!

Even though this State finished last (!) , it would have been nice to do so as not being associated with the Butchers Apron. Although, come to think of it , it's such an embarrassing , unimportant and out-dated 'competition' that it's probably no harm that it's the Union Jack that is being associated with one of the losers instead of the Irish Tricolour. God knows we have more than enough genuine losers here , without adding some wannabe singer to the mix!

Thanks for reading, Sharon.






Wednesday, May 15, 2013

POLITICAL TERMINATORS OF THE FUTURE.

'THERE WILL BE ANOTHER DAY.....' By Peadar O'Donnell ; first published in January 1963.

For a short time I taught in a hovel of a place and in making the yearly return, by way of answers to printed questions on a form, I permitted myself considerable freedom : "How often was the school floor washed during the year ?" - every time it rained. "Are flowers cultivated in window boxes or in the grounds ?" - no , but we have a lovely crop on the roof. "Is there a school museum ?" - no, but the school should be in one. "Is there a school lavatory(or other suitable arrangements) ?" - no, but there is an unlimited scope of mountain with certain other facilities. Father Scanlan signed the return, without reading it, but I had overlooked the question about rent and so the form came back to him with all my answers underlined in red ink, and a request for an answer to the question on rent. Next time I called, Father Scanlan produced the form : "you have to write 'no' there, " he told me!

I wrote to the Education Office for an umbrella that I might use during heavy showers , pointing out that while the children did not matter, I did , for they had spent money on me and it would be bad economy to lose me for the sake of what an umbrella would cost. I had no idea in the world that such a letter would be sent back to Father Scanlan and put him to the trouble of writing letters to the Education Office - indeed, it was only by chance I found out that my letter was sent to him.

Then one day I suggested that it might be a good idea if we should knock down the school as they would then have to build us a new one : he told me to sit down and he would talk to me. I must bear in mind that there was a war on , it was early 1916. They would do nothing for us. A few evenings later, on my way home to my lodgings from a band practice - I had a contract to teach a fife-and-drum band for the Hibernians at Doochary - I looked at the soot-marked old shanty with its chimneys buried in the thatch : there was nobody around except the three special buddies who were accompanying me home and they were of the same mind that it would not take much on the bulge in the gable to do all the destruction we needed. Next morning I called on Father Scanlan and told him that the school had fallen during the night.....(MORE LATER).


THE BETRAYAL OF 1916 -



- REVISIONISM EXPOSED.....

From 'IRIS' magazine, Easter 1991.

By Martin Spain.

The official programme for Dublin's year as 'Cultural Capital of the European Community' did not even mention 1916 and a commemorative stamp to mark the anniversary wasn't even planned until pressure was put on the government. It is an indication of the success of the revisionists that the State saw no problem the previous year in bringing out a stamp to commemorate the Battle of the Boyne. The success of the 'Reclaim the Spirit of 1916 Committee' in organising throughout the country forced the Dublin government's hand.

The military parade is the result , and even this small concession is too much for the leader of Fine Gael , John Bruton : he has called for the commemoration to celebrate not just the 1916 Rising but also those who fought in the First World War. This idea should be examined in the context of his vicious anti-nationalism and anti-republicanism. He commented last December that a country ruled by (P)Sinn Féin would be "an Ireland of prison camps and jails, of secret police and cleansing pogroms" , which sounds more like a description of the present corrupt Northern statelet.

Bruton and his ilk would do away with (FS) Articles Two and Three * of their constitution to "bring about a change in unionist attitudes". What Bruton , Haughey , O'Malley and all the other leaders of the 26-County State really fear is a new Ireland where their record will be seen for what it is. The 26-County State is as corrupt as its Six-County counterpart. Constant economic crises, savage unemployment figures and a constant flow of citizens forced to emigrate to earn a living are not the mark of a successful nation State. Homelessness is a major problem , cutbacks in education and health have widened the barriers of privilege between the haves and the have-nots , and a third of the population lives below the poverty line. (* How ironic ! PSF would , in 1998 , in campaigning for the Stormont Treaty [GFA] , seek to have those two FS Articles watered down to suit the minority Unionist populaton in Ireland!) (MORE LATER).


15TH MAY 1847-

-DEATH OF DANIEL O'CONNELL.

Ireland 1843 - 45 years after the 'United Irishmen' Rising , 5 years before the 'Young Irelanders' were to rise up in arms against British mis-rule , and 15 years before the Irish Republican Brotherhood was founded (on Saint Patricks Day , 1858) . The population of Ireland was in decline - 'famine' struck again and approximately 2 million people were to leave the island ; one million people emigrated and the same number died . A Mr. Stephen de Vere was an eye-witness on one of the emigrant ships - "Before the emigrant has been a week at sea , he is an altered man . How can it be otherwise ? Hundreds of poor people , men , women and children , of all ages , from the drivelling idiot of ninty to the babe just born , huddled together , without light , without air , wallowing in filth and breathing a foetid atmosphere , sick in body , dispirited in heart . The fevered patients lying between the sound in sleeping places so narrow as almost to deny them a change of position ....by their agonised ravings disturbing those around them . Living without food or medicine except as administered by the hand of casual charity , dying without spiritual consolation and buried in the deep without the rites of the Church..."

The 'Repeal Association' , led by Daniel O'Connell in the early 1840's, was one of the largest mass movements in Europe at the time ; it had its 'roots' in the 'Catholic Association' which , between 1823 and 1829 , led by O'Connell , and supported by the Catholic Hierarchy , organised the vast majority of the population into a political body seeking emancipation - for at least six years (1823-1829) the campaign was relentless ; civil unrest in Ireland and prolonged agitation in England itself concerning the issue . The British Prime Minster , 'Sir' Robert Peel , relented in 1829 , and Catholic Emancipation was passed at Westminster . Daniel O 'Connell was a 'God' - to the Irish , he could do no wrong , and he continued to press the British for more 'reforms' of the system . But , to the British , O'Connell was becoming more of a troublesome 'thorn in the side'. On April 15th , 1840 , Daniel O'Connell launched the 'Loyal National Repeal Association' (as it called itself from 1841 onwards - at its inception it was simply known as 'The Repeal Association' : O'Connell was back-tracking with the name-change , all but apologising to the Brits for asking them to 'tweak' the system a little more in favour of the Irish.)

Daniel O'Connell made it clear that it was his desire that Ireland should remain under the British 'Monarchy' - saying , if you like (as PSF , the SDLP , Fianna Fail etc are now saying) ' ...stay if you want , just treat us better.' The only force to be used , he stated , was "moral force" ; but even this was too much of a demand for Westminster - 'Sir' Robert Peel (Brit PM) replied that to 'grant' O'Connell his way " would not merely mean the repeal of an Act of (British) Parliament , but dismemberment of a great Empire . Deprecating as I do all war but above all , civil war , yet there is no alternative which I do not think preferable to the dismemberment of Empire... " A group within the 'Repeal Association' (or 'The Loyal National Repeal Association' , as O'Connell insisted it be known as) supported Daniel O'Connell in his endeavours but were not convinced that "moral force" alone would win the day ; they were the 'Young Irelanders' , and they viewed their leader "with a mixture of affection and impatience......." In 1842 , 'The Young Irelanders' established a newspaper called 'The Nation' , in which they supported the objectives of the 'Repeal' Movement . The newspaper , under the control of 26 years-young Charles Gavan Duffy , supported Daniel O'Connell in his quest to publicise the 'Repeal' Movement , and helped to organise and promote outdoor meetings (known as 'Monster Meetings') at which the objectives of the 'Repeal' Movement could be advanced.

The year 1843 was promoted as 'The Year of Repeal' , and Daniel O'Connell took his message to the people ; in Mullingar , County Westmeath , he addressed a crowd of approximately 150,000 people . The British 'authorities' were watching these developments with interest and , while no doubt regarding the 'Loyal' Daniel O'Connell as no more than a 'rebel pet' , were presumably more worried by the fact that the huge crowds he drew would be susceptible to the less 'loyal' message coming from 'The Young Irelanders' . After the Mullingar 'Monster Meeting ' , which was viewed as a tremendous success by the organisers , 'The Nation' newspaper helped to publicise another such meeting - this time in Mallow , County Cork : 400,000 people turned up - the Brits were uneasy . A third 'Monster Meeting' was held in Lismore , County Waterford - again , a crowd estimated at 400,000 people attended . At each meeting , the 'Young Irelanders' were recruiting , having made their position clear in the pages of their newspaper , 'The Nation' , in leaflets , and by word of mouth - ie
' we get back whatever we can by O'Connell's methods , but will not confine ourselves to those methods alone...'

The British were perplexed at what to do regarding the 'Monster Meetings' - were they a 'safety valve' at which the 'agitators/rebels' could let off steam in a more-or-less harmless fashion , or were they a possible recruiting exercise at which the more militant element could 'plot and plan' ? However , after the 15th August 1843 , the Brits decided to take action ; for it was on that date that between 800,000 and one million people gathered on the Hill of Tara in County Meath for a 'Monster Meeting' ; the 'Young Irelanders' newspaper , 'The Nation' , put the figure for those in attendance at the Hill of Tara 'Monster Meeting' at three-quarters of a million people "without fear of exaggeration" ; Daniel O'Connell himself claimed it was at least one-and-a-half million people , while another newspaper of the day ('The Times' ?) reported - " The whole district was covered with men . The population within a days march began to arrive on foot shortly after daybreak and continued to arrive , on all sides and by every available approach , 'till noon . It was impossible from any one point to see the entire meeting . The number is supposed to have reached between 500,000 and 700,000 persons... " Other reports stated that O'Connell's marshals were on horseback , that the crowds arrived on foot and in carriages , banners were present , as were bands and groups in " historic fancy dress " . Indeed , archaeologists have found human bones on the site , some of which are said to be 4000 years old , and traces of wooden platforms , bits of clay pipes and , of course (!) , whiskey bottles , dating back to the mid-19th Century. On that day in Irish history , Daniel O'Connell addressed a sea of people - " We are at Tara of the Kings - the spot from which emanated the social power , the legal authority , the right to dominion over the furthest extremes of the land .... the strength and majority of the National Movement was never exhibited so imposingly as at this great meeting . The numbers exceed any that ever before congregated in Ireland in peace or war . It is a sight not grand alone but appalling - not exciting merely pride , but fear . Step by step , we are approaching the great goal of Repeal of the Union , but it is at length with the strides of a giant..."

Again , it must be stressed that Daniel O'Connell would use only "moral force" to achieve what he termed "...Repeal of the Union " and, even then , favoured the island of Ireland remaining as a unit governed by the British 'Monarchy' - a 'new' coat of varnish on rotten timber . O'Connell could 'talk the talk' but .......however : the 'Monster Meetings' were a great success - despite all the "misfortunes" (as the Brits would have it) that the Irish people were suffering in their daily lives ; the desire , the demand , for a British withdrawal had not gone away . And , as stated here a few paragraphs back , after the Tara 'Monster Meeting' (15th August 1843) the Brits decided it just wasn't cricket : enough was enough . A 'Monster Meeting' planned for Clontarf , in Dublin , which was to take place on Sunday , 8th October , 1843 , was banned by the Brits on Saturday , 7th October 1843 - the day before the event was due to take place ; Daniel O'Connell and others in the leadership of 'The Loyal National Repeal Association' quickly lodged a complaint
(they were later to be arrested by the Brits and sentenced to a year in prison for 'conspiracy' , but this judgement was then reversed in the British House of Lords) . On Saturday , the 7th of October 1843 , O'Connell noticed that posters were being put-up in Dublin by the British 'authorities' stating that the following days meeting had been banned , he backed down ; in this scribblers opinion he should have 'stuck to his guns' and ignored the British 'writ' - he should have went ahead with the Clontarf 'Monster Meeting' therby 'putting it up' to the Brits . But... "moral force only" won the day ; O'Connell issued his own poster that same day (ie Saturday 7th October 1843) as well as spreading the word through the 'grapevine' that the meeting was cancelled . That poster makes for interesting reading .......

NOTICE :

WHEREAS there has appeared , under the Signatures of " E.B. SUGDEN , C. DONOUGHMORE , ELIOT F BLACKBURN , E. BLAKENEY , FRED SHAW , T.B.C. SMITH , " a paper being , or purporting to be , a PROCLAMATION , drawn up in very loose and inaccurate terms , and manifestly misrepresenting known facts ; the objects of which appear to be , to prevent the PUBLIC MEETING , intended to be held TO-MORROW , the 8th instant , at CLONTARF , TO PETITION PARLIAMENT for the REPEAL of the baleful and destructive measure of the LEGISLATIVE UNION .

AND WHEREAS , such Proclamation has not appeared until LATE IN THE AFTERNOON OF THIS SATURDAY , THE 7th , so that it is utterly impossible that the knowledge of its existence could be communicated in the usual Official Channels , or by the Post , in time to have its contents known to the Persons intending to meet at CLONTARF , for the purpose of Petitioning , as aforesaid , whereby ill-disposed Persons may have an opportunity , under cover of said Proclamation , to provoke Breaches of the Peace , or to commit Violence on Persons intending to proceed peaceably and legally to the said Meeting .

WE , therefore , the COMMITTEE of the LOYAL NATIONAL REPEAL ASSOCIATION , do most earnestly request and entreat , that all well-disposed persons will , IMMEDIATELY on receiving this intimation , repair to their own dwellings , and not place themselves in peril of any collision , or of receiving any ill-treatment whatsoever . And we do further inform all such persons , that without yielding in any thing to the unfounded allegations in said alleged Proclamation , we deem it prudent and wise , and above all things humane , to declare that said MEETING IS ABANDONED, AND IS NOT TO BE HELD.

SIGNED BY ORDER ,

DANIEL O'CONNELL,

CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE .

T. M. RAY , Secretary .

SATURDAY , 7 th OCTOBER , 1843 . 3 O 'CLOCK P.M.

RESOLVED - That the above Cautionary Notice be immediately transmitted by Express to the Very Reverend and Reverend Gentlemen who signed the Requisition for the CLONTARF MEETING , and to all adjacent Districts , SO AS TO PREVENT the influx of Persons coming to the intended Meeting .

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN .

Browne,Printer, 36 Nassau Street.


The Brits had turned on their 'rebel pet' ; to enforce their ban , Westminster ordered a number of gunboats and land-based artillery pieces to train their weapons on the Clontarf area . Daniel O'Connell was aware that thousands of people would already be on their way to the Clontarf meeting (some having left their homes on the Friday , or earlier , for the walk to Dublin) so he sent his marshals out from Dublin on horseback , urging the crowds to return home : he could do nothing else , having allowed the British to dictate his pace - O'Connell and his 'Loyal Association' had painted themselves into a corner ; they fell into a trap of their own making . He had publicly and repeatedly vowed to work within " the law " (ie British 'law') which could have at any time been used , as it eventually was , to ban his agitation and he had vehemently ruled out the use of force in any circumstances in challenging the British .One of the results of the decision by Daniel O'Connell to cancel the Clontarf 'Monster Meeting' was that the public lost faith in him and in the 'Loyal National Repeal Association' ; when he realised that he had lost that support , he expressed the view that "repeal of the Union" could not be won. The 'Young Irelanders' denounced him and began preparations for a military Rising - but the people were , for the most part , dispirited , and the 'Great Hunger' (so-called 'Famine') was taking its toll. Today , our people are again 'dispirited' and a different sort of 'Great Hunger' is among us - one for economic and moral justice, which is not only being denied by the British in six of our counties, but is also being denied in the other 26 counties by those in Leinster House who purport to 'govern' that area.


BUY YOUR LOTTO TICKETS FROM ANTO !

Anto the Cool Dude !

Those familiar with the manner in which this raffle is held will verify that the raffle drum is taken by two committee members to eight different people , picked at random (usually the child with the loudest voice or, perhaps, a shy child who would like to pick a ticket but is too afraid to ask !) as one of the 'safety measures' ie it ensures that 'a friend with a loaded sleeve' (!) will not be able to influence the outcome : one of the reasons this raffle is the success it is is because it is not only a pure 'pot luck' raffle but it's seen to be such , which is very important, regardless of whether the tickets cost €2 each or €20 each. Punters don't mind if they don't win so long as they are 100% confident that those that do win do so in a fair manner, and that is guaranteed with this monthly event.

And that 'fairness' proved to be a saving grace for us on Sunday , as one of our sellers had four winners (each one of which was pulled from the drum by a different punter) ! Anto , who sells about 100 tickets each month for us , sold the 1st , 2nd , 6th and 8th prize to , respectively, Calo (208) , Paddy L (29) , TBX (067) and Theresa (217) , all of whom were present (and all of whom were decked-out in different 'colours' as they all supported different soccer teams that were playing that day, which added greatly to the atmosphere (!) as each one approached the raffle table to claim their prize !) and , for his sins, we made Anto say a few words as Theresa was legging it to the bar to spend her winnings ! Calo was stunned to walk away with €200 , as was Paddy L with his €100 , and TBX and Theresa were just as chuffed with their few bob !

Our third prize , €40, was won by JJC , on ticket number 371 , an Australian , living in Dublin, visiting the Kildare hotel and cheering for West Ham United - 'a well travelled individual' , as one of the girls put it , and he certainly found his way to the bar (!) but not before we got him to pull-out the fourth prize (€20 , ticket 509) which a member of the bar staff , Gerry M , had sold to one of the locals, Alex , who almost forgot to collect it as he was still trying to figure-out JJC's heritage ! Out fifth prize ,ticket 546, €20, was won by MM and sold to her by Mattie and the seventh prize of €20 went to Trish K , from Arklow, on ticket 461.

All things considered - the myriad of (interchangeable !) soccer supporters , the kids , curious hotel guests and Anto strutting his stuff like a peacock ! - it was a very successful venture for the Movement and a pleasure to work with , and for, people of such fine caliber!


FREE STATE ADMINISTRATIONS : TERMINATORS OF THE FUTURE.

Three hours - and they hope you are gone forever.

Whether it's Fine Gael and Labour (as it is now) or Fianna Fail and the Greens (as it was before them) , both State administrations share the one objective : to stay in power , feathering their own nest, until such time (four years) as the State political pension-for-life kicks in. And they have learned well from those that went before them : the best way to lessen opposition to your objective is to thin-out the ranks of those most likely to oppose you and that is just what is continuing to take place here - this 'Time To Go?' study (pdf document) highlights the colossal loss of young and older people that are financially forced to look for a livelihood in another country thus , as per the current law in this State, taking their right to a political voice in this State with them. That last link explains the problem , whilst this one points to the solution.


NO PLACE FOR SICK PEOPLE.

The 'joke' is on us taxpayers.

This article has appeared in a few Irish-American newspapers earlier on this month and should be forwarded to other newspapers and magazines as a warning to those visiting these shores from civilised countries :

"Since our return to Ireland last May life in Ireland has been good to our family. I’ve not complained about much. We have everything we want and we remain positive when friends in the U.S. ask us how we could live in an Ireland steeped in a recession because they certainly couldn’t.We had nothing negative to say about our own experience and that’s the truth.Until now that is.

It has finally happened. We came face to face (indirectly) with the Irish medical system, and yes, it’s as bad as they say it is. It’s an utter disgrace, and I’m here to tell you what we saw first-hand. It wasn’t pretty. My husband John’s mother made a recent trip to the emergency room at the, about a ten-minute drive from her home. It turned out it wasn’t a serious issue but she needed tending to immediately.She arrived at the reception area of the emergency department at 6:10 p.m. on a Wednesday evening. Like any emergency room at that time of the day it was manic.

Seats were full. Patients and their loved ones stood along corridors, sat on floors and paced back and forth in an effort not to go insane. Parents and children, people of pensionable age and many more middle aged folks all looked sickly and irritated.A young lady who appeared to be in her late twenties told my mother-in-law she had been there three hours and still hadn’t been seen to by a nurse.“You’re in for a long night,” Mary was told. She had no idea. After a few minutes of standing, a young man with a gentle face took pity on Mary and gave her his seat. She sat patiently and waited her turn.It was close to 10 p.m. before a nurse came to take her vitals and carry out some blood work. The nurse advised her yet again that it was going to be a long night.

Midnight struck, and by this stage everyone was tired, cranky and hungry. Mary was finally admitted into the emergency room, and what she saw before her was shocking. Beds full with patients, some in a very sickly way, took over the floor space. It wasn’t designed for this. Getting to the nurse’s station inside the department felt like one was walking through an obstacle course.There were beds all over the place. It was utter mayhem. When they ran out of beds, patients (depending on the severity of their medical problem) sat on plastic chairs propped up against walls throughout the department.Mary was directed to a chair for the following four hours. By this stage she was extremely tired and a little weak. She watched as some unruly characters entered the emergency room with various ailments, some causing quite a stir.In the end the only reason she got a bed (about 4:30 a.m.) in the emergency room was because she took a weakness and fainted.

At one point during the night she needed to use the bathroom. She was told there was a queue forming and it was best she went outside to the main hospital and used the public toilets. She barely had the energy to get off the bed. We sat with Mary as she tried to close her eyes to get some sleep. I was disgusted by what I was seeing.The nurses were running around trying to keep up with patients being admitted and others being discharged. At one point a young fella entered the emergency room via ambulance with what looked like a screwdriver stuck in his head. It wasn’t a pretty sight, and we didn’t ask what kind of altercation he was in before arriving to the hospital.Not only were the doctors and nurses trying to do their job, but they had to deal with scantily clad girls fighting with each other. A mother sitting across from us attempted to shelter her two-year-old son from such carry on.

It was disgraceful and kind of intimidating too. It was hard to know what would happen next.

When dawn crept in it was made clear to Mary that she would be admitted to the hospital for further tests, but she was warned it would be a while before a bed became available upstairs. Mary worked in that same hospital for 26 years as a secretary and retired three years ago.It didn’t matter though. There simply wasn’t a bed available for her. The hospital was as overrun as the emergency room.As I sat with Mary early on the Friday morning I pulled out my laptop and began writing what I saw around me. In the emergency room there were approximately eight bays where patients were put when admitted. All eight bays were full.There was another 15 or so patients sitting on chairs and 12 or so beds scattered across the moderately sized room. It was simply a case of wherever they could shove in a bed they did. It was necessary because a lot of these patients weren’t able to sit or stand, but it made the job of the nurses, doctors and porters next to impossible. They zipped in and out between beds, administered medicine where needed and hooked others up to IV's.

My poor mother-in-law was shoved up against a wall near the emergency room entrance. One minute it was warm, too warm. The next minute a blast of cold blew through the corridor making patients shiver.Behind Mary a little baby shared a chair with his mother. He squealed in pain. The nurses tried to appease him but it was difficult, both on the little boy and his mother.Across the corridor we could hear a man coughing. It was a rough, dry cough. The owner clearly didn’t have the energy to lift his head.He lay on a hospital bed, sheets strewn to the side. He was wearing a pair of jeans, an old looking shirt and had a hole in both his white socks. I’m not sure where his shoes were. He finally stopped coughing.The sound of monumental pain echoed from the bed next to him. The sounds were ad hoc, but when they came from the small-framed woman propped up in a bed I felt for her. She was alone.

The nurses and doctors were just too busy to attend to her needs. She had been admitted but that’s as far as she got.

A sprightly looking woman had her leg propped up in a bed. She looked exhausted. Later on I spoke with her to discover she came to the hospital at 2 p.m. the previous day and was still waiting for a bed upstairs.Beside her lay a man in his forties who had chest pains. His wife was worried. He wasn’t being kept in because scans showed nothing out of the ordinary.He told me he was waiting three hours for discharge papers. He was lying in a bed that could have been used for someone else, but because the staff were so overrun they hadn’t time to release his bed.Later that day we sat next to a lady in her nineties. She was frail. She didn’t have it in her to even speak. After a few minutes of tossing and turning she called for a nurse. She looked in distress. No nurse could tend to her. She started vomiting.John went to her bedside, propped her up and placed a jug underneath her chin so she would not choke while getting sick. The nurse came over, handed John a cardboard bowl and instructed him to hold it under the lady’s chin. He did as he was told.I could see the woman was ever so embarrassed and very grateful at the same time. She was alone.

I stayed with Mary until lunchtime on the Friday. I left her in an exhausted state and not any closer to a bed in the hospital itself.As I left the mayhem through the emergency room reception area there was another 40 or so people waiting to be seen to. It was unbelievable.Mary finally got a bed in a ward upstairs at 5 p.m. on Friday. She was 23 hours in the emergency room.We read about the state of our hospitals in the newspapers, we hear about it on the radio, we chat about it at dinner parties but to experience it, even indirectly, is a whole different story.

While living in New York we had our fair share of trips to the emergency room and the hospital. Each time we came away saying how wonderful the service was, even if it did cost us an arm and a leg (we didn’t have insurance). The nurses and doctors were always so attentive, and although we may have waited two or three hours in an emergency room to be seen to or admitted, it was nothing like the craziness I experienced in Limerick last week. I pray to God that I don’t have to bring either of my two children to the emergency room anytime soon."


If you have the misfortune to attend one of the remaining hospitals in this State, you won't see a politician or his/her son or daughter in the Waiting Room , the A+E ward or, indeed, on a trolley in a corridor : they have the financial means to go 'Private' or, better still , to go abroad for treatment. They are aware that, 'thanks' to their cutbacks, the State health service here is akin to a cattle market in a Third World country and is not to be trusted : those that have no option other than to attend same for any illness can be practically guaranteed that , at the very least , they will leave the hospital worse than when they entered. The 'vomiting bug' is rampant in State hospitals at the moment and can prove lethal for very young or elderly patients. But maybe that's what it will take for the majority of people here to 'wake up' , politically , and challenge the system and those that operate and profit from it - a dead son , daughter , mother or father etc. But I doubt that even that would force some people to face up to the reality of the situation.


REARRANGING THE CHAIRS ON 'THE SS HEALTH SERVICE' , A SINKING SHIP.

'Captain' Reilly attempts to convince the 'passengers' that there will be enough chairs to satisfy all if he can just re-arrange the existing stock.....

Despite election commitments from James Reilly and his Fine Gael crew ("....Fine Gael's FairCare policy offers universal health insurance in a system to be run by private insurance companies, at no additional cost to the taxpayer.....there will be free GP care....an end to waiting lists...the two-tier system of access will end....under FairCare, we will make public hospitals more efficient....") , the best they can do is to apply a poor-quality sticking plaster to the existing structure ( ie place the existing failed entities into six 'groups', each of which will have its own Chief Executive and five 'Senior Offices' [so it's not just the useless State Senate that career politicians load with their suited buddies] with that particular 'management group' being accountable (lol!) for its 'group') and link the sticking-plastered entity to medical training centres and universities.

The given election commitments/promises worked but only in so far that those words helped to convince a good section of the electorate in this State that Fine Gael 'were gonna put things right in the health service' and they received enough votes to form an administration with the State Labour Party. But the 'words' (election promises) were quickly abandoned by Fine Gael , and the State Labour Party , as expected, didn't hold their State administration colleagues to account. Mary Harney performed much the same sleight-of-hand trick with her so-called 'Centres of Excellence' and it worked for her - she is now living off the State taxpayer to the tune of a €2700-a-week pension , a financial goal which Captain Reilly must hope his '49 into 6' plan will score for him.

The doors here should have been welded shut and a finger held on the 'Down' button. Because that surely is where the sick in this State are headed. Down.


PUTTING MANNERS ON THEM !

One is a Westminster-paid paramilarity thug employed in Ireland whilst the other is, apparently, a well-mannered Westminster-paid paramilitary thug employed in Ireland....

As part of their (on-going) efforts to 'sell' the failed Stormont Treaty ('Peace Process/GFA') to those of their party members who aren't soft SDLP/Labour-type activists at heart , the PSF leadership had to invent something which appeared to make the whole sell-out worth while to their more 'militant' members , and they settled on the subject of 'policing'.

A 'guarantee' was given to the PSF militants (!) that , in return for their acquiescence, "manners" would be put on the RUC/PSNI, the pro-British 'police force' that is tasked with 'keeping the peace' in that part of British-occupied Ireland. This , of course, was never going to be permitted by Westminster but those PSF 'militants' once again allowed their leadership to do the thinking for them and it succeeded in buying some extra time for Lords Adams and McGuinness etc but they are now reduced to downplaying their 'guarantee' as 'a work in progress' - a spin is now being attempted by the PSF leadership that there remains "a force within a force" in the RUC/PSNI (as opposed to the overall 'police force' itself) which has 'not yet' had "manners" put on them despite the best efforts of Gerry and Martin etc !

But the PSF leadership are aware that no walkouts will take place as a result of this failure as their remaining members are not the type that hold strong republican views (that type left decades ago) and all they have to do to appease their SDLP/Labour-type members is to be seen to demand radical change rather than actually achieving same. And, once they continue to be salaried by Westminster and/or Leinster House , it's a readily perceived pretense they are happy to go along with , laughing all the way to the bank. Or to that private hospital , mentioned above.


EXTRA ! EXTRA ! READ ALL ABOUT IT......!

Tommy Morris , Fine Gaeler and avid reader...

The 'good-day-to-publish-bad-news' trick is well known in political circles but, apparently , a small-time Fine Gael wanna-be spin doctor thought he could start a new trend and get away with it , not realising that the yokes on the ceiling with the little flashing lights were not actually smoke alarms !

The 'bad news' had already been published so Mr Morris either decided himself to try and prevent those that might vote for his Master from reading it or he was dispatched to do that job - either way , he should have known that , despite popular fokelore, politicians and their minions are not actually invisible between elections ! "Caught Rapid..." , as we say in Dublin, but those type of characters are renowned for taking more than copies of free newspapers off you....

Thanks for reading, Sharon.