Wednesday, September 18, 2024

IRELAND, 1919 - IRA VOLUNTEERS ASSEMBLED FOR "SPECIAL DUTIES..."

ON THIS DATE (18TH SEPTEMBER) 173 YEARS AGO : DEATH OF AN IRISH HEROINE.

'Anne Devlin was born in County Wicklow around the end of the 1770s into a nationalist family. In 1800, Anne met Robert Emmet and moved into his house to assist him in his plans for an uprising in Dublin. On the evening of the 23rd July, 1803, the rising went ahead in Dublin, but despite taking the British authorities by surprise, the rebellion collapsed.

Anne and her eight year old sister were arrested. She was interrogated and tortured in order to get information about the whereabouts of Emmet. She refused to speak. On the 20th September 1803 Emmet was executed on Thomas Street, Dublin.

She was kept in solitary confinement in Kilmainham Gaol in squalid conditions and was subjected to brutal treatment, but consistently refused to cooperate despite the fact that her entire family were also being held. She was finally released in 1806. Anne Devlin died in September 1851 in the Liberties area of Dublin’s city centre ('1169' comment - she died from starvation on the 18th of that month ; 173 years ago on this date).

She was buried in a paupers plot in Glasnevin Cemetery, but following the efforts of a Doctor Richard Robert Madden, she was exhumed and reinterred with a headstone..' (From here.)

On the 2nd March 1914, Patrick Henry Pearse, 37 years of age, delivered the following address to a packed venue in the 'Academy of Music' in Brooklyn, New York :

"Wherever Emmet is commemorated let Anne Devlin not be forgotten.

Bryan Devlin had a dairy farm in Butterfield Lane ; his fields are still green there. Five sons of his fought in '98. Anne was his daughter, and she went to keep house for Emmet when he moved into Butterfield House.

You know how she kept vigil there on the night of the rising. When all was lost and Emmet came out in his hurried retreat through Rathfarnham to the mountains, her greeting was — according to tradition, it was spoken in Irish, and Emmet must have replied in Irish - "Musha, bad welcome to you! Is Ireland lost by you, cowards that you are, to lead the people to destruction and then to leave them ?"

"Don't blame me, Anne, the fault is not mine", said Emmet.

And she was sorry for the pain her words had inflicted, spoken in the pain of her own disappointment. She would have tended him like a mother could he have tarried there, but his path lay to Kilmashogue, and hers was to be a harder duty.

When Major Sirr (pictured) came out with his soldiery she was still keeping her vigil. "Where is Emmet?", they demanded to know.

"I have nothing to tell you," she replied, and to all their questions she had but one answer : "I have nothing to say ; I have nothing to tell you."

They swung her up to a cart and half-hanged her several times ; after each half-hanging she was revived and questioned : still the same answer.

They pricked her breast with their bayonets until the blood spurted out in their faces. They dragged her to prison and tortured her for days. Not one word did they extract from that steadfast woman.

And when Emmet was sold, he was sold, not by a woman, but by a man — by the friend that he had trusted — by the counsel that, having sold him, was to go through the ghastly mockery of defending him at the bar.

The fathers and mothers of Ireland should often tell their children that story of Robert Emmet and that story of Anne Devlin.

To the Irish mothers who hear me I would say that when at night you kiss your children and in your hearts call down a benediction, you could wish for your boys no higher thing than that, should the need come they may be given the strength to make Emmet's sacrifice, and for your girls no greater gift from God than such fidelity as Anne Devlin's.."

Anne Devlin was an Irish republican famous for her involvement with the United Irishmen, and enduring terrible conditions, as well as torture, when imprisoned by British forces in Ireland.

She died, aged 71, on the 18th September, 1851 - 173 years ago on this date.



























Original IRA 'Squad' members, pictured, above, in 1948 -

Seated : Vinnie Byrne, Piaras Béaslaí, Mick McDonnell, Frank Thornton, Jim Slattery.

Standing : Frank Bolster, Ben Byrne, Frank Saurin, Joe Guilfoyle, Pat McCrea, Barney McMahon, Charlie Dalton, Joe Leonard, Sean O Tuama, and Jimmy Shiels (Volunteers Tom Keogh and Tom Kilcoyne, among others, such as Dan Breen, Sean Tracey, John Joe Hogan, Seamus Robinson, Thomas Whelan and Patrick Moran, were seconded when required).

Although actually formed months earlier, 'The Squad' held its last 'unofficial' meeting on the 18th September, 1919 - the next day Michael Collins formally announced, 'inhouse', the establishment of the Unit.

In mid-July 1919, a selected number of IRA Volunteers arrived at 35 North Great George's Street in Dublin, where two prominent Volunteers, Dick McKee and Mick McDonnell, addressed the gathering -

"They picked out a number of us and took us to an inner room. Dick McKee addressed those of us who had been selected and asked us if we had any objection to shooting enemy agents. The greater number of Volunteers objected for one reason or another but I said I was prepared to obey orders. We were merely told that we were to be given special duties..."

- Volunteer Jim Slattery, describing what happened during a part of the meeting.

Other venues in Dublin used by the Squad include Number 3 Crow Street (off Dame Street), a builder's yard in Abbey Street ('George Moreland and Company') and a stable in North Great Charles Street.

Unfortunately, the majority of the Squad accepted the Treaty of Surrender in 1921/1922, and (ab)used their skills of assassination against their own.

==========================







WHY DOESN'T THE CENSUS ADDRESS ETHNICITY...?





By Niina Hepojoki.

From 'Magill' Magazine, March 2002.

It has been suggested that James Joyce was one of the first artists ever to imagine a world without foreigners.





In his essay 'Strangers in Their Own Country', Professor Declan Kiberd defines this Joycean world as... "..one possible once men and women begin to accept the foreigner in the self* and the necessarily fictive nature** of all nationalisms, which are open to endless negotiations."***



('1169' comment -* There is no "foreigner in the self" [except, perhaps, for those that are 'Woke'] as far as any indigenous people should be concerned ; we are what we are, and shouldn't seek to change our very DNA to suit anybody.

** - Nationalism is not of a "fictive nature" ; rather it is of a factual narrative and nature.

*** - "endless negotiations" ie 'those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well, I have others...' ; the very 'building blocks' of a 'Woke' structure!)

"There has been concern that the census and its results could be used as some kind of a whipping tool", said one source.

This year's census will, however, include a question on the Travelling Community, which was lobbied for by Pavee Point, the Travellers' rights group, as well as a question of nationality.

"We would have hoped to see an overall question on ethnicity in the form so we are not entirely happy with just a question on Travellers.

Our concern is that the Travelling Community as a result might feel isolated when identified as the only ethnic group in the census", says Brigid Quirke, health co-ordinator of the voluntary organisation (sic - it's a GONGO agency, funded by State taxpayers).

To overcome these worries, Pavee Point will be taking part in the information gathering with CSO, as "kind of consultants..."

(MORE LATER.)

























In September, 1920, the East Clare Brigade of the IRA (pictured) took delivery of a number of bombs from the Dublin IRA, to be used in an attack on Scariff RIC Barracks, in East Clare, close to the shores of Lough Derg.

Volunteers who took part included Tomas Malone (alias Séan Forde), Michael Brennan, Alfie (Alphie) Rodgers, Michael 'Brud' McMahon and Martin Kildea, but the Dublin engineers let them down...

'From all surrounding parishes, on Saturday evening, September 18th, 1920, groups of armed young men moved closer to the town of Scariff.

Within the town, IRA Volunteers...central to the planned action, waited, impatiently...the republican leadership in East Clare had decided to move on the heavily fortified RIC barracks in Scariff...' (From here.)

==========================

















A Mr Maurice P. Hankey (pictured), who was born on the 1st April, 1877, in Biarritz, in France, was educated at a private day school in Brighton and then Rugby School, and began his 'naval career' at 18 years of age as a probationary Second Lieutenant in the Royal Marine Artillery, from where he attended the 'Royal Naval College' in Greenwich, in London.

Mr Hankey rose through the political ranks and, in 1920, he was appointed as the 'Secretary to the British Cabinet' and was a trusted accomplice to a Mr David Lloyd George ('1st Earl Lloyd-George of Dwyfor'), the Prime Minister of the 'United Kingdom' (!).

Mr George, having been in a position of political authority during the 1916 Rising, had 'suffered the Irish' for the four years since then and was getting weary of it - he was beginning to entertain the idea that a military victory by Westminster in Ireland was not only not visible on the horizon but, indeed, might not be attainable at all without even greater losses to his political and military forces, which wouldn't be acceptable to his own people.

On the 18th September, 1920, Mr Hankey wrote that his bosses intention at that time... "..was to to pass the Irish Bill, establish a parliament in Ulster and, if Southern Ireland refuses to establish a parliament (ie the Leinster House assembly), withdraw from the interior, occupying the posts only.."

By "the posts" he meant the political and military structures that Westminster had established in the cities ie 'abandon the rural areas, concentrate our rule in the urban centres'.

That was in 1920 - within a year and a few months, anti-Irish elements had agreed between themselves to sacrifice six of our counties to British imperialism, and we are still paying for that folly today...

==========================



On the 18th September, 1920, a British Army Lance Corporal, a Mr Robert Clout ('Service Number 6908971'), who was attached to the 'Prince Consort's Own Rifle Brigade' of the '2nd Battalion Royal Sussex Regiment', was in a barracks in Finner Camp, Ballyshannon, County Donegal, when he was shot dead.

A Private Byrne was, basically, 'playing' with a rifle when it went off - the bullet hit Mr Clout in the throat, inflicting a wound that killed him.

The unfortunate soldier is buried in Chatham (Maidstone Road) Cemetery in his own country, England.

==========================













On the 18th September, 1920, IRA Volunteers entered a house in Gorey, County Wexford, where the Redmond family lived, and gave the man of the house a beating, then tarred him.

Mr Redmond had been advised to cease using his car to drive RIC members around the district, but he had ignored the advice.

The following night, another Wexford man, a Mr Patrick Cullen, was taken to a grave yard where a number of IRA Volunteers were waiting for him.

He was placed in front of a freshly-dug grave and told he was there because he had ignored advice to keep his distance from RIC members, and was then put on trial.

After the proceedings, the Volunteers again advised him to keep better company, and left the area. Mr Cullen later made his own way home.

==========================

















On the 18th September, 1920, Field Marshal 'Sir' Henry Hughes Wilson (pictured), 1st Baronet, GCB, DSO ETC ETC (!) wrote to a 'Sir' Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill KG OM CH TD DL FRS RA ETC ETC (!), stating -

"I see no reason why, with patience and firmness, we may not wear the trouble down (in Ireland) in the course of a few years".

Within about a year, however, they had an army of Free State Irishmen in their back pocket, to "wear the trouble down" for them...

==========================

















On the evening of the 8th September, 1920, a drunken, armed, Black and Tan driver, a man from Middlesex, in England - a Mr Edward Krumm, a 5'11"-tall bachelor, 26 years of age - and an equally drunk friend of his, a Mr Christopher Yorke, left their second or third pub and were making their way to Galway Railway Station to buy a copy of a newspaper, as they wanted the results of that days horse racing.

IRA Volunteers had been observing the pair of them, because a shipment of arms from Longford was due in that night on the train and, as well as that, the train station was a good vantage point for them to observe the movements of enemy troops, to collect despatches and to meet Volunteers from other areas - the IRA didn't want any unnecessary attention focused on the station, and Mr Krumm and his buddy, who had already made a nuisance of themselves in the town, were likely to continue to cause trouble.

And cause trouble they did - Mr Krumm, who believed himself to be "an ace shot", had his gun in his hand in the railway station and was causing a scene, so a few Volunteers moved in on him to disarm him and deal with him later, but he started shooting - Volunteer Séan Mulvoy (pictured) was badly wounded (and died later that evening from his wound), so another IRA man, Frank O'Dowd, shot the drunken Tan, who died at about 1am the following morning, and two other Volunteers -Tom Fahy and Michael Hynes - picked up his gun and left the area (Mr Krumm's mother received £2,100 compensation for his killing plus £100 for funeral costs).

The British Army held a 'Military Court of Inquiry' into the incident, at which a local woman, a M/s Eileen Baker, gave evidence, despite the IRA having advised people not to do so.

On the morning of the 18th September, 1920, a number of IRA Volunteers visited M/s Baker, held her down and cut off her hair, as a warning to herself and others to heed such advice in future.

That night, a number of RIC men and British Army soldiers 'arrested' five local women who they suspected were Cumann na mBan Volunteers and shaved their heads in retaliation.

Incidentally, the Galway IRA got the Longford guns that night - as the ruckus in the train station was taking place, the train had come to a halt just outside the station and the weapons were unloaded and taken safely away.

==========================







ON THIS DATE (18TH SEPTEMBER) 178 YEARS AGO - BIRTH OF A 'FENIAN UNIONIST'.

James Standish O'Grady (Anéislis Séamus Ó Grádaigh, pictured) was born on the 18th September, in Cork, in 1846 - 178 years ago on this date.

He was a 'mixed bag' of a person, having been born into the 'landlord class' but, at the same time, possessing enough cop-on to realise that if a political/financial/social system lacked the (minor) benefits to the less well-off of a 'trickle down' effect, then trouble was guaranteed.

He was of the opinion that he had more in common with the Irish 'aristocracy' than he had with his own 'class' in the fine halls and castles of Westminster and, witnessing the suffering in Ireland, apparently felt that England had somehow betrayed its standing and reputation (!) in the world because of the way the Irish were been treated.

'The Pictorial Times', a popular newspaper of the day, described the then attempted genocide of the Irish people in the following report, dated the 10th October, 1846 -

'Around them is plenty ; rickyards, in full contempt, stand under their snug thatch, calculating the chances of advancing prices ; or, the thrashed grain safely stored awaits only the opportunity of conveyance to be taken far away to feed strangers...but a strong arm interposes to hold the maddened infuriates away. Property laws supersede those of Nature.

Grain is of more value than blood. And if they attempt to take of the fatness of the land that belongs to their lords, death by musketry is a cheap government measure to provide for the wants of a starving and incensed people..'

Mr O'Grady realised that the unrest among the Irish could at least be lessened, if not smoothed-over completely, if only his own type on what he no doubt regarded as 'the main land' would be 'fair' towards those they were thieving from and, to that end, he wrote to those that had influence over those he called 'the landlords of Ireland' -

"I say that even still you are the best class in the country, and for the last two centuries have been ; but, see, the event proves that you were not good enough, had not virtue enough. Therefore you perish out of the land, while innumerable eyes are dry.

Christ save us all, you read nothing, know nothing.

This great modern, democratic world rolls on with its thunderings, lightnings and voices, enough to make the bones of your heroic fathers turn in their graves, and you know nothing about it, care nothing about it.

Of you, as a class, as a body of men, I can entertain not the least hope ; indeed, who can?

If you are quite satisfied to lose all that you have inherited, to be stripped naked, and in the slime to wrestle with dragons and gorillas hereafter for some morsel of official income which you will not get, then travel that way.

If you are satisfied to see all the worth, virtue, personal refinement, truth and honour which you know to be inherent in your own order wiped, as with a sponge, out of Ireland - maybe a bloody sponge - then travel that way.

If you wish to see anarchy and civil war, brutal despotisms alternating with bloody lawlessness, or, on the other side, a shabby, sordid Irish Republic, ruled by knavish, corrupt politicians and the ignoble rich, you will travel the way of égalité."

His plea for 'fair play' for the Irish fell on deaf ears, but he was right in regards to this State ('the republic') 'being ruled by knavish, corrupt politicians and the ignoble rich..', and that remains the case, but that would probably be little comfort to him as he lay on his deathbed in Shanklin, Isle of Wight, in England, in 1928 - he was 81 years of age when he went to his grave, leaving behind a reputation, among some, of being a 'Fenian Unionist'.























On the 12th September, 1921, Mr Éamon de Valera wrote to a Mr David Lloyd George in Westminster, London, in furtherance of a meeting between British and Irish political representatives.

On the 18th September, 1921, Mr George wrote back to Mr de Valera -

"My colleagues and I cannot meet them (the Irish delegates) as the representatives of a sovereign and independent State without disloyalty on our part to the (British) Throne and Empire. I therefore must repeat that unless the second paragraph* in your letter of the 12th is withdrawn conference between us is impossible..."

(*That paragraph sought an acknowledgment from Mr George that he and his people were meeting with 'representatives of a sovereign and independent State'.)

On the 19th September, 1921, Mr de Valera wrote back to the man, stating -

"We had no thought at any time of asking you to accept any conditions precedent to a Conference.

If you seek to impose preliminary conditions, which we must regard as involving a surrender of our whole position, they [the Conference] cannot meet..." and then asks Mr George to state whether his intent is to demand a surrender of the Irish or is it part or an invitation to a Conference "free on both sides...?"

Mr George replied saying that since he could not enter into a conference on the basis of the correspondence to date that they should start over again -

"We therefore send you herewith a fresh invitation to a Conference in London on October 11th (1921), where we can meet your delegates as spokesmen of the people whom you represent with a view to ascertaining how the association of Ireland with the community of nations known as the British Empire may best be reconciled with Irish national aspirations. Conference, not correspondence, is the most practical and hopeful way to an understanding..."

The next day, Mr de Valera accepted the offer on the basis that... "..our respective positions have been stated and understood..".

And so it was that the 'Treaty of Surrender' talks ('negotiations') officially began on the 11th October 1921, placing us in the position we still suffer today - with six of our thirty-two counties still under the jurisdictional control of Westminster.

==========================











...and, talking of losers - being the proud Dubs that we are! - we couldn't let this go without mention...

18th SEPTEMBER 1921 -

Kildare (1-4) lose to Dublin (3-3) in the Leinster Final replay in Croke Park.

Na, na, na, naa, naaaa...!

==========================







THE FORGOTTEN PEOPLE...



Emigration from Ireland to the United States continued throughout the 1990's, although the reasons were no longer so bluntly economic.

Now, in the wake of September 11th, the US authorities have been granted increased powers to investigate legal status, and Irish illegal emigrants are more vulnerable than ever before.

By Mairead Carey.

From 'Magill Annual', 2002.

No one knows how many Irish illegals are currently living in New York, let alone America.

Fr Tom Flynn of the 'Aisling Irish Centre' believes that in his own area of Manhattan - the Bronx and Yonkers - at least 5,000 illegal Irish immigrants have arrived in the last five years.

"Irish people seem to think that emigration had gone away, but we see a steady stream of Irish to New York, particularly from the North and from border counties.

As the economy got better at home, the divide between the rich and poor got greater. Those who didn't have a great education found themselves in jobs that weren't giving them enough money to keep them in the Celtic Tiger economy.

They were very low-paying jobs and they didn't feel they were going anywhere. They come here for different reasons", he says, "many come for the experience, many because they want to get away from home.

They leave Ireland because of personal problems, they think the problems will go away once they come to the US. We are seeing a lot of young Irish people bringing out a drug problem.

We have problems with ecstasy in particular - they are more likely to get in trouble and as a result are more vulnerable..."

(MORE LATER.)



























"The peace of Belfast does not apparently meet with favour in some quarters, as, after a good period of welcome orderliness, some persons of the hooligan type have been doing their best to revive the awful deeds which disgraced the city several months ago..."

- 'The Belfast Telegraph' newspaper, 16th September 1922.

"Belfast is a bright spot in the midst of the darkness and gloom that hang over southern Ireland. Conditions in the Six Counties are as free from crime and bloodshed as are Kent and Lancashire..."

-'The Belfast Telegraph' newspaper, 18th September 1922.

Obviously, sometime between the 16th and the 18th, 'The Belfast Telegraph' owner had been instructed by Westminster to tone down the criticism.

Same thing happens today ; so-called 'journalists' and the equally so-called 'newspapers' they write for are subservient to the interests of whatever political power is in place at the time.

==========================

















On the 18th September, 1922, a Mr William Thomas Cosgrave, the 'Chairman of the Provisional Government' in the Free State (from August 1922 to December 1922) introduced a bill to Leinster House enacting the 'Constitution of the Irish Free State' (pictured) and, the next day, that political assembly agreed to prepare a new electoral register for that State.

Nowadays...well, for the last twenty years, actually...that scenario is, and has been, operated in reverse, with the 'new voter base' acquired first...

==========================















On the 18th September, 1922 (listed elsewhere as having happened on the 20th), 18-years-young Margaret Collins was visiting her grandfather in Grangemore, Brannockstown, County Kildare, and was walking through a potato field.

The poor girl had either found herself in the middle of an IRA arms dump or had found something which piqued her curiosity ; the object she picked up to examine was actually a bomb - it exploded, killing her instantly.

Her father was a well-known republican activist in the area.



==========================







ON THIS DATE (18TH SEPTEMBER) 157 YEARS AGO : TWO IRISH FENIANS RELEASED FROM BRITISH PRISON VAN.

"These Irish are really shocking, abominable people. Not like any other civilised nation..."

- the words of Britain's 'Queen' Victoria, on hearing about the 'Manchester Outrage', as she called it.

Her comments were replied to by one of the 'uncivilised Irish' people she was speaking about :

"I will die proudly and triumphantly in defence of republican principles and the liberty of an oppressed and enslaved people..."

- the words of 18-years-young William Allen, from Bandon, County Cork.

The "outrage", as far as the British are concerned, anyway , began on the 11th September that year (1867) (...although, in reality, it began for us Irish in 1169) when, in the early hours of the morning of Wednesday, 11th September 1867, two men were arrested by police in Shudehill, Manchester, on suspicion that they were about to commit a robbery.

The two men were charged under the 'Vagrancy Act' and were detained in police custody, and it was then they were recognised, by fellow Irishmen in British police uniforms, as Colonel Thomas J.Kelly and Captain Timothy Deasy (both pictured), two known Fenians.

Their comrades in Manchester, which was the 'Bandit Country' of its day, vowed to free the two men and, on the 18th of September, 1867 - 157 years ago today - as a prison van carrying the two men (and a 12-years-young boy, plus three female prisoners) was travelling on the Manchester to Salford road, on its way to 'deposit the cargo' in Belle Vue Gaol on the Hyde Road in Gorton, Manchester, accompanied by a team of 12 horse-mounted policemen, it was attacked by about 50 Fenians.

Kelly and Deasy were handcuffed and locked in two separate compartments inside the van, guarded by a police sergeant, a Charles Brett, and, as such, were unable to assist their comrades outside.

The mounted police escort fled the scene on seeing the number of attackers but Brett was obviously unable to do so : the Fenian rescuers were unable to force open the van and advised Sergeant Brett that it would be for his own good to open the doors and let the prisoners go.

Mr Brett refused the offer, and was looking through the keyhole to further assess his situation when one of the rescuers decided to shoot the lock apart - the bullet went through the keyhole and hit Brett in the head, killing him instantly.

One of the female prisoners had the good sense to take the keys from his pocket and hand them out through an air vent to those outside, and Kelly and Deasy were taken to safety.

Twenty-six men were later arrested and tried for playing a part in the rescue, and five of them were detained to stand trial, on 1st November 1867, for their alleged part in what the British called the "Manchester Outrage" : all five were actually sentenced to be hanged, but one was granted clemency and another was 'pardoned' as the evidence against him was found to be perjured.

The other three - William Allen, Michael O'Brien and Michael Larkin - the 'Manchester Martyrs' - were hanged in front of thousands of baying spectators on Saturday, 23rd November 1867, in Salford, Manchester, outside the New Bailey Jail.

In an address to the court, William Philip Allen (pictured), 18, stated -

"No man in this court regrets the death of Sergeant Brett more than I do, and I positively say, in the presence of the Almighty and ever-living God, that I am innocent ; aye, as innocent as any man in this court. I don't say this for the sake of mercy : I want no mercy — I'll have no mercy. I'll die, as many thousands have died, for the sake of their beloved land, and in defence of it."

"I will die proudly and triumphantly in defence of republican principles and the liberty of an oppressed and enslaved people.

Is it possible we are asked why sentence should not be passed upon us, on the evidence of prostitutes off the streets of Manchester, fellows out of work, convicted felons — aye, an Irishman sentenced to be hanged when an English dog would have got off. I say positively and defiantly, justice has not been done me since I was arrested.

If justice had been done me, I would not have been handcuffed at the preliminary investigation in Bridge Street ; and in this court justice has not been done me in any shape or form.

I was brought up here and all the prisoners by my side were allowed to wear overcoats, and I was told to take mine off. What is the principle of that? There was something in that principle, and I say positively that justice has not been done me.

As for the other prisoners, they can speak for themselves with regard to that matter. And now, with regard to the way I have been identified. I have to say that my clothes were kept for four hours by the policemen in Fairfield station and shown to parties to identify me as being one of the perpetrators of this outrage on Hyde Road.

Also in Albert station there was a handkerchief kept on my head the whole night, so that I could be identified the next morning in the corridor by the witnesses.

I was ordered to leave on the handkerchief for the purpose that the witnesses could more plainly see I was one of the parties who committed the outrage. As for myself, I feel the righteousness of my every act with regard to what I have done in defence of my country. I fear not. I am fearless — fearless of the punishment that can be inflicted on me ; and with that, my lords, I have done."

However, he then added the following -

"I beg to be excused. One remark more. I return Mr. Seymour and Mr. Jones my sincere and heartfelt thanks for their able eloquence and advocacy on my part in this affray. I wish also to return to Mr. Roberts the very same. My name, sir, might be wished to be known. It is not William O'Meara Allen. My name is William Philip Allen. I was born and reared in Bandon, in the County of Cork, and from that place I take my name ; and I am proud of my country, and proud of my parentage. My lords, I have done."



Michael Larkin (pictured), 32, lived in the Banagher region of County Offaly and was a tailor by trade.

He was not of good health and himself and his two comrades were captured as they carried him away from the scene of the rescue. He, too, addressed the court :

"I have only got a word or two to say concerning Sergeant Brett. As my friend here said, no one could regret the man's death as much as I do. With regard to the charge of pistols and revolvers, and my using them, I call my God as witness that I neither used pistols, revolvers, nor any instrument on that day that would deprive the life of a child, let alone a man.

Nor did I go there on purpose to take life away. Certainly, my lords, I do not want to deny that I did go to give aid and assistance to those two noble heroes that were confined in that van, Kelly and Deasy. I did go to do as much as lay in my power to extricate them out of their bondage ; but I did not go to take life, nor, my lord, did anyone else.

It is a misfortune there was life taken ; but if it was taken it was not done intentionally, and the man who has taken life we have not got him. I was at the scene of action, when there were over, I dare say, 150 people standing by there when I was. I am very sorry I have to say, my lord, but I thought I had some respectable people to come up as witnesses against me ; but I am sorry to say as my friend said — I will make no more remarks concerning that.

All I have to say, my lords and gentlemen, is that so far as my trial went, and the way it was conducted, I believe I have got a fair trial. What is decreed a man in the page of life he has to fulfil, either on the gallows, drowning, a fair death in bed, or on the battle-field. So I look to the mercy of God. May God forgive all who have sworn my life away. As I am a dying man, I forgive them from the bottom of my heart. God forgive them."



Michael O'Brien (pictured), 31, from Ballymacoda in Cork, was a lieutenant in the US Army and was better known in England by the name 'William Gould'.

He delivered the following speech to the court :

"I shall commence by saying that every witness who has sworn anything against me has sworn falsely. I have not had a stone in my possession since I was a boy. I had no pistol in my possession on the day when it is alleged this outrage was committed. You call it an outrage, I don't. I say further my name is Michael O'Brien.

I was born in the county of Cork and have the honour to be a fellow-parishioner of Peter O'Neal Crowley, who was fighting against the British troops at Mitchelstown last March, and who fell fighting against British tyranny in Ireland. I am a citizen of the United States of America, and if Charles Francis Adams had done his duty towards me, as he ought to do in this country, I should not be in this dock answering your questions now.

Mr. Adams did not come, though I wrote to him. He did not come to see if I could not find evidence to disprove the charge, which I positively could, if he had taken the trouble of sending or coming to see what I could do. I hope the American people will notice this part of the business."

He then read a passage from a paper he was holding -

"The right of man is freedom. The great God has endowed him with affections that he may use, not smother them, and a world that may be enjoyed. Once a man is satisfied he is doing right, and attempts to do anything with that conviction, he must be willing to face all the consequences. Ireland, with its beautiful scenery, its delightful climate, its rich and productive lands, is capable of supporting more than treble its population in ease and comfort.

Yet no man, except a paid official of the British Government, can say there is a shadow of liberty, that there is a spark of glad life amongst its plundered and persecuted inhabitants. It is to be hoped that its imbecile and tyrannical rulers will be for ever driven from her soil amidst the execrations of the world.

How beautifully the aristocrats of England moralise on the despotism of the rulers of Italy and Dahomey — in the case of Naples with what indignation did they speak of the ruin of families by the detention of its head or some loved member in a prison. Who has not heard their condemnations of the tyranny that would compel honourable and good men to spend their useful lives in hopeless banishment?"

"They cannot find words to express their horror of the cruelties of the King of Dahomey because he sacrificed 2,000 human beings yearly, but why don't those persons who pretend such virtuous indignation at the misgovernment of other countries look at home, and see that greater crimes than those they charge against other governments are not committed by themselves or by their sanction?

Let them look at London, and see the thousands that want bread there, while those aristocrats are rioting in luxuries and crimes. Look to Ireland ; see the hundreds of thousands of its people in misery and want. See the virtuous, beautiful and industrious women who only a few years ago — aye, and yet — are obliged to look at their children dying for want of food.

Look at what is called the majesty of the law on one side, and the long deep misery of a noble people on the other. Which are the young men of Ireland to respect — the law that murders or banishes their people or the means to resist relentless tyranny, and ending their miseries for ever under a home government? I need not answer that question here.

I trust the Irish people will answer it to their satisfaction soon.

I am not astonished at my conviction. The Government of this country have the power of convicting any person. They appoint the judge ; they choose the jury ; and by means of what they call patronage (which is the means of corruption) they have the power of making the laws to suit their purposes. I am confident that my blood will rise a hundredfold against the tyrants who think proper to commit such an outrage.

In the first place, I say I was identified improperly by having chains on my hands and feet at the time of identification, and thus the witnesses who have sworn to my throwing stones and firing a pistol have sworn to what is false, for I was, as those ladies said, at the jail gates.

I thank my counsel for their able defence, and also Mr. Roberts, for his attention to my case."

All three men shouted the words "God Save Ireland!" at different times during the 'trial', perhaps realising that, then, as now, the British were going to get their 'pound of flesh' one way or the other.

The three men were hanged by the British on the 23rd November, 1867, but are still remembered and commemorated today by Irish republicans ; they gave their lives that their comrades may live again.







BEIR BUA...

The Thread of the Irish Republican Movement from The United Irishmen through to today.

Republicanism in history and today.

Published by the James Connolly/Tommy O'Neill Cumann, Republican Sinn Féin, The Liberties, Dublin.

August 1998.

('1169' comment - 'Beir Bua' translates as 'Grasp Victory' in the English language.)

REPUBLICANS AND THE STATE :

In a statement on July 25th, 1987, Thomas Maguire wrote -

"The faithful members of that Executive, in accordance with the IRA Constitution, filled the vacancies in the Executive and that Executive continues as the lawful Executive of the Irish Republican Army.

The Continuity Executive has appointed an Army Council of the IRA.

I quote the following extract from my statement of 31st December 1969 :

'In December, 1938, the surviving faithful members of the latest 32 County Republican Parliament, the Second Dáil elected in 1921, delegated their executive powers of government to the Army Council of the IRA.

This Proclamation of 1938 was signed by SS Ó'Ceallaigh ('Sceilg'), Ceann Comhairle, Mary MacSwiney, Count Plunkett, Cathal Ó Murchú, Brian O'Higgins, Professor Stockley and myself, Tomás Maguire.'

I hearby declare that the Continuity Executive and the Continuity Army Council are the lawful Executive and Army Council respectively of the Irish Republican Army, and that the governmental authority, delegated in the Proclamation of 1938, now resides in the Continuity Army Council, and its lawful successors."

Dated the 25th day of July 1987.

Signed : Thomas Maguire,

Tomás Maguidhir,

Comdt. General.

(MORE LATER.)

Thanks for the visit, and for reading!

Sharon and the team.





Sunday, September 15, 2024

IRELAND, 1900's - 'NO SHAME WOULD ATTACH TO A REFUSAL...'

IRELAND, 1900's - VOLUNTEERS HANDPICKED AS ASSASSINS.











The IRA leadership were aware that not all Volunteers would be capable of doing what they were about to be asked, and made it clear that no shame would attach to a refusal - that those that weren't prepared to go that far 'down in the mire' would be tasked elsewhere.

A core group put themselves forward, after their objective was explained, and their contact details were collected.

A second grouping of Volunteers, to operate as 'stand-ins', was organised to supplement the first group, when required, and .38's were exchanged for .45's...

...and that's just one of the eighteen pieces we'll be writing about, on Wednesday, 18th September 2024.

To our eternal shame, our impropriety and our dishonor, this fine Irish rebel woman was buried in a paupers plot in the 19th century. Despite the public pain and disappointment she endured, and the reasons she endured that suffering, she was discarded.

Mea culpa...



Wrestling with deaf dragons and gorillas who know nothing and care nothing in 19th century Ireland - rogues, called out by a 'toff' with 'royal' blood with a green tint...

England, 19th century - their 'Irish problem' had, once again, being brought to their doorstep as a result of 'suspicions the authorities had that these Irishmen were about to commit an offence'. The 'court case', such as it was, went ahead, even though the verdict had already been decided...

As stated, we have an 18-part post almost ready for Wednesday, 18th September 2024 : sure the only thing we ain't got yet is a promise from yerself that you'll pop-in then, but ya will, won't ya...?!

(PS - Hello to Josh, the 'old woman' [play on words there!] from North GGS who'll be joining us on the 18th : hope we don't let ya down or, if we do, that it's gently...!)

Thanks for the visit, and for reading : see y'all on the 18th!

Sharon and the team.





Wednesday, September 11, 2024

1920 : A ONE-ARMED BANDIT AND DIFFERENT PAYOUTS...

ON THIS DATE 101 YEARS AGO : FIRST DAY OF A LON-ANNOUNCED (AND IMAGINED) 'NEW NATION'!









A LESS-THAN-USELESS FAILED INSTITUTION.

(No, not Leinster House - that it is the above goes without saying!)













We refer to the so-called 'League of Nations' organisation which , on this date in 1923 - 11th September - opened its doors on 'Day 1' of having somehow officially announced the 'birth of a new nation' - Ireland, all 26 of its 32 Counties, that is!

The new entity (!) was, unbelievably, allowed membership of that August body (!) as "a nation".

This despite the fact that the application was endorsed by a (Free State) political administration which was in turmoil and had only just 'officially' emerged from a war with its neighbour, Britain, the effects of which were still being felt in the country as a whole and, indeed, are still being felt to this day, as the issue remains unresolved.

The 'main man' at the time, in this then war-torn State, William T. Cosgrave - a republican-poacher-turned-Free State-gamekeeper - was delighted that the Free State was 'allowed' to join the then four year-old 'League', which was considered by both the home-grown and foreign political 'Establishment' as a 'sacred circle'.

The British representative in that failed grouping, amongst others, gave what was described at the time as an "..eloquent speech...a spontaneous manifestation of good-will toward Ireland (sic) (in which) felicitations were extended...(to the new member)..."

And why wouldn't Westminster (and its 'friends' in Ireland and abroad at the time) welcome an acknowledgement by Cosgrave and his ilk that, to all intent and purpose, they agreed with Westminster that the part of Ireland handed back to 'the Irish' was indeed considered to be a 'nation', as it helped propagate the lie that the (still occupied) six north-eastern counties of Ireland were "part of the Empire".

Mr Cosgrave died 48 years ago but the political fault-line he so ably gave succor to in 1923 (and before and after that year) lives on after him.

Nothing to be proud of.





























On the 11th September, 1919, a Mr George Frederick Ernest Albert (aka 'King George V of England', pictured) asked his 'Lord Privy Seal of England', a Mr Bonar Law, what measures the British government were taking to protect... "..the lives of unoffending people in Ireland, and what measures were to be brought into parliament for the government of the country..?"

The "unoffending people" in Ireland were, no doubt, those who weren't fighting against the savage hordes unleashed on them by Mr Albert and the political savage hordes he surrounded himself with.

Anyway - the poor man wasn't in the best of health, and he died, at 70 years of age, on the 20th January, 1936, in London, from a purposely-administered drug overdose.

Whether his death was an act of euthanasia, medically assisted suicide or murder, he should have been more concerned about his own governance than that of a country foreign to him...

==========================



















On the 11th September, 1919, a British Army soldier attached to the 1st Battalion of the North Staffordshire Regiment, a Mr Samuel Morley (34, 'Service Number 46695'), killed himself in the Curragh, in County Kildare.

He is buried in Stoke-on-Trent (Hartshill) Cemetery, in England.

==========================



On the night of the 11th September, 1919, the IRA raided the home of Mrs Florence Watt-Smyth, in Castlewarden, County Kildare, and took away any arms and munitions they found there.

A lineage between the woman of the house and a Lieutenant Colonel Gerald Watt-Smyth, from Larne, in County Antrim, seems possible, and would explain why the rebels were convinced that weapons were in the house.

If our family connections are accurate, the couple had a two-year-old child, James, at the time of the raid, who was born in Naas, County Kildare, and who followed his father into a life in the British Army.

When James was 27 years of age he was stationed in Burma (Staff Captain in the 'Special Operations Executive Force 136') and is listed as 'KIA, February 1945', and is buried in Taukkyan War Cemetery, in Burma ('Myanmar').

==========================







WHY DOESN'T THE CENSUS ADDRESS ETHNICITY...?





By Niina Hepojoki.

From 'Magill' Magazine, March 2002.

It has been suggested that James Joyce was one of the first artists ever to imagine a world without foreigners.





In his essay 'Strangers in Their Own Country', Professor Declan Kiberd defines this Joycean world as... "..one possible once men and women begin to accept the foreigner in the self* and the necessarily fictive nature** of all nationalisms, which are open to endless negotiations."***



('1169' comment -* There is no "foreigner in the self" [except, perhaps, for those that are 'Woke'] as far as any indigenous people should be concerned ; we are what we are, and shouldn't seek to change our very DNA to suit anybody.

** - Nationalism is not of a "fictive nature" ; rather it is of a factual narrative and nature.

*** - "endless negotiations" ie 'those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well, I have others...' ; the very 'building blocks' of a 'Woke' structure!)

In September 1999, the Central Statistics Office (CSO) piloted a version of a question which mixed together nationality and ethnic origins.

This pilot came out of a public consultative process, which resulted in a government memorandum from the CSO recommending that the question be included in the 2001 census.

However, none of the consulted bodies were happy about the wording of the question.

The government decided against the inclusion of ethnicity, quoting, for instance, "the sensitivity of the issue" as one of the reasons. Sources involved in the pilot say that ethnicity as a question in the census form remains a "controversial issue" ; some fears have also been expressed about the possibility that the census could be hijacked*...

(* Not "hijacked", but availed of, to point out that, then - 2002 - the State was being filled-up with foreigners.

Now - 2024 - we're full. And have been for over a decade, at least.)

(MORE LATER.)

























John Toner was born on the Newtownards Road in Belfast in 1870 and, when he was 20 years of age, he got a job in the Belfast shipyards but, in his late 40's, now living in Cable Street in the city, had to give it up for health reasons - it was tough, noisy industrial work, and he had damaged his hearing (tinnitus?) from the constant din.

He still needed to earn a living and was trying to do so as a carter and, on the evening of the 11th September, 1920, as he was on his way home from his rounds, he was shot dead by a British Army soldier.

The soldier later stated that John Toner was in breach of the curfew and refused to stop when shouted at to do so, so he shot him.

Mr Toner was practically deaf.

The poor man is buried in Dundonald Cemetery, in Belfast ('Grave Number E6 152').

==========================







ONE-ARMED BANDIT...











On the 11th September, 1920, at least four men in disguise entered the yard of Kilkenny Post Office, attacked a Post Office driver, beat him up, bound and gagged other employees and stole eleven full bags of post.

The raiding of Post Offices and removing postbags was one of the ways that the IRA gathered intelligence so, naturally, they were blamed for the raid, even though they denied it.

On the night of the 10th October, what was said to be the same gang of men drove, in a hired car, to the home of a Mr John Power, in Thomastown, County Kilkenny, who was the manager of a creamery business and, at about 2am, banged on his halldoor, shouting "Come down and open the door immediately. We are the Black and Tans..!"

On opening the door, Mr Power was bundled back inside, all house lights were turned off and his safe was robbed of about £75, a fortune in those days - the daily pay of a Private in the British Army at that time was about two shillings, and there were 20 shillings in one pound : about 3 years wages for a British Army soldier was taken in that house raid.

However, it is believed that Mr Power, in his report about the robbery, wrote that one of the raiders had no left arm, a description that fitted one of the 11th September Post Office raiders.













Newspaper reports had recorded the recent dismissal of a one-armed British Army Auxiliary Major, a Mr Ewen Cameron Bruce (pictured) for 'conduct unbecoming an officer' - the man was a thug, and would apparently do anything for money.

An investigation revealed that British Army Auxiliary Major Ewen Cameron Bruce and his nephew, Temporary Cadet Alan Thomas Bruce, had recently hired a car and picked up two other men - a Lieutenant Cooper and a Sergeant Blake of the British Army Devonshire Regiment - and the four men carried out both of the robberies.

All the thieves were members of the 'Auxiliary Division' of the RIC based in Woodstock House, Inistioge, in County Kilkenny, and it was discovered that the mail bags from the Post Office raid were taken back to 'A Coy' British Army base at Inistioge, where they were looted for cash and other valuables.

Incidentally, Mr Bruce, who was wounded five times in July 1917 in France at the 'Battle of Passchendaele', losing his left arm as a result, had legged it back home to England when the finger started to be pointed at him and was arrested by his own people there and returned to Ireland to stand trial ; he got away lightly, too - a one-year prison sentence, with his nephew, Temporary Cadet Alan Thomas Bruce, receiving a three-month sentence.

Also, on the same date (11th September 1920) that Mr Bruce and his fellow bandits were going to or coming from the Post Office that they robbed, the Newbridge and Athgarvan Companies of the 7th Brigade Kildare IRA were out and about themselves, raiding several venues where they knew arms and munitions could be had.

Different priorities...

























"Sir,

The desire you express on the part of the British Government to end the centuries of conflict between the peoples of these two islands, and to establish relations of neighbourly harmony, is the genuine desire of the people of Ireland.

I have consulted with my colleagues and secured the views of the representatives of the minority of our Nation in regard to the invitation you have sent me.

In reply, I desire to say that I am ready to meet and discuss with you on what bases such a Conference as that proposed can reasonably hope to achieve the object desired.

I am, Sir,

Faithfully yours,

Eamon de Valera."

- the text of a letter sent from a Mr Éamon de Valera, in the Mansion House, Dublin, to a Mr David Lloyd George, in London, on the 8th July, 1921.

It was known at the time that, as part of their 'peace' offering, the British were intending to partition Ireland, an intention which was focussing the minds of many people, and groups, in Ireland.

On the 14th July, the meeting was held in London and, although no actual agreement was recorded as having being made, Mr Lloyd George made it clear that neither a republic nor independence for all 32 counties of Ireland was on the table, adding that he (Mr Lloyd George)could "...put a soldier in Ireland for every man, woman and child in it.." if the IRA did not immediately agree to stop fighting.

Way to 'negotiate', Mr George ; de Valera wanted an Ireland entirely separated, politically and militarily, from Britain, while the British insisted that loyalty to their 'King' and some form of 'association' must remain.

Meanwhile, at home, in August, Mr de Valera secured political approval to change the 1919 Dáil Constitution to 'upgrade' his official office from 'Prime Minister/Chairman of the Cabinet' to the title of 'President of the Republic' and, in his 'new' position, on the 11th September, he received a delegation from County Down, described as a 'joint Nationalist-Sinn Féin delegation', who expressed misgivings in relation to the country being partitioned, as did similar delegations he met with from Derry, Antrim, Belfast and the Glens.

'For' and 'against' opinions were expressed, and one speaker, an elected councillor, a Mr James Baird (a 'Rotten Prod'!), opined that... "...partition would place power in the hands of those responsible for the pogroms.."

And partition did just that - 'placed power in the hands' of Westminster and its puppet/Vichy 'parliament' in that part of Ireland, the Stormont Administration.

==========================



On the 11th September, 1921, Michael Collins released figures showing that 1,700 Irish republicans were still interned by the British and another 1,500 were separately serving prison sentences (including 40 women)
.
















Within a few months, Mr Collins and his Stater colleagues and comrades were doing the same, and worse, to Irish republicans (...including women).

==========================







THE FORGOTTEN PEOPLE.



Emigration from Ireland to the United States continued throughout the 1990's, although the reasons were no longer so bluntly economic.

Now, in the wake of September 11th, the US authorities have been granted increased powers to investigate legal status, and Irish illegal emigrants are more vulnerable than ever before.

By Mairead Carey.

From 'Magill Annual', 2002.

The crackdown and its consequences ; a prisoner serving a life sentence in upstate New York left Ireland with his family at the age of two. Seventeen years ago he was convicted of murder and is currently serving out the final days of his sentence.

He is due out on parole in the coming days, and will be released into the custody of the 'Immigration And Naturalisation Service' (INS) and, because his family never took citizenship, he will be immediately deported to Ireland.

As far as the American authorities are concerned, he is Irish, even though he has spent 43 of his 45 years in the US.

There are some in the US who believe that this case is a measure of things to come ; in the aftermath of the attacks on September 11th, there is a growing intolerance to the undocumented.

Mohamed Atta was an illegal, and so were the other 17 hijackers.

A crackdown is being called for, and the thousands of Irish who are living in the US illegally will not be immune from any new measures brought in...

(MORE LATER.)

























Eoin O’Duffy, left in pic, inspects a guard of honour in 1933 ; 'He was an IRA man, a supporter of the Treaty and of the Irish Free State, a fascist and...a defender of democracy..' (!)



On the 11th September, 1922, Free State Army General Eoin O'Duffy was appointed the first Commissioner of the new Free State 'Civic Guard' which, in August 1923, was renamed as the 'Garda Síochána na hÉireann' and from 1925 referred to as 'An Garda Síochána'.

Mr O'Duffy must have been glad that he and his people had no jurisdiction in our six north-eastern counties because, on the same date that he was appointed, the 'Local Government Act (Northern Ireland) 1922' received 'Royal Assent' ie it came into force which, among other civil misdeeds, abolished proportional representation in local government elections and required a 'Declaration of Allegiance' from persons elected to, or employed by, local political authorities.

And we'd take an educated guess here and suggest that one of the first cases to be investigated by Mr O'Duffy and his colleagues could have been to find out who it was that fired a shot at the FSA Bishop's car from the ruins at Jigginstown Castle in Naas, County Kildare, as it drove past, on the 11th September (1922) : the Catholic Church leadership was about to annouce that those who shoulder weapons against the Free Staters were to be banned from the Church Sacraments.

The Jigginstown Castle sniper gave them their answer...

==========================



A Mr Denis Whelan, a labourer, from the Dublin Road, Maudlins, Naas, in County Kildare, was 'arrested and detained' by Free State soldiers on the 11th September, 1922 ; there is no record of what happened to Mr Whelan, or who he was, but a man by that name, and from Maudlins, was known to be an IRA Volunteer with the 1st Battalion, 7th Brigade of the 1st Eastern Division of the IRA, and he would have been known in the Kill, Kilteel, Rathmore and Straffan areas.

==========================

















"They (the IRA) have now adopted a type of warfare, of which they have years of experience.

They now operate over territory which they know.

They are now better armed and better trained than they were against the British.

In short, they* have placed me and my troops in the same position as the British were a little over a year ago..."

- Free State Army Major General James Emmet Dalton (pictured), in a letter he sent on the 11th September, 1922, from Cork, to his Commander-in-Chief, Michael Collins, both of whom were republican-gamekeepers-turned-Free State-poachers.

* - It wasn't the IRA who placed the FSA in that position ; they did that to themselves.

==========================

















On the 11th September, 1922, comment was raised in Leinster House in relation to their army having attacked the IRA rebels in the Four Courts in Dublin, on the 28th June.

Their 'Minister for Justice', a Mr Kevin O'Higgins (pictured), declared -

"We had very good reason to believe that we anticipated by a couple of hours the creation of conditions under which this Parliament never would have met – conditions that would have brought back the British power – horse, foot, artillery and the Navy – in hostile relations to this country..."

Ironic, considering that it was Mr O'Higgins and his political and military colleagues, supported by their owners in Westminster, who posed the biggest threat to Ireland, and still do.

Also, before they went home after their days work on the 11th, the members said a few words about the then on-going strike by Post Office workers and a vote was held which showed that the majority of those politicians were against recognising the right of public servants to strike.

"Hostile relations" indeed.















The next day (12th September), the 'President of the Executive Council' of the Free State, a Mr William Thomas Cosgrave (pictured) stated -

"The action taken was not for the mere formula of the supremacy of parliament, but a formula for the security of the people, of the security of their lives, and the value of their money in the country..."

The only people that have ever had "security" in this State, and that have got "value" from it, are the State 'Establishment', not the ordinary people. In fact, it was, and is, that same 'Establishment' that have, and are, destroying whatever hope the ordinary people have for 'security and value'.

After Mr Cosgrave finished his spiel, those present in Leinster House held a vote on the motion 'That the Dáil (sic) approves of the action that the Government has taken and is taking to assert and vindicate the authority of this House...' and, not surprising, that motion is passed by 54 votes to 15, proving that (political) contortionists can clap themselves on the back.



==========================

















In a letter he sent to Mary MacSwiney on the 11th September, 1922, Mr Éamon de Valera stated -

"Reason rather than faith has been my master.

For the sake of the cause I allowed myself to be put into a position which it is impossible for one of my outlook and personal bias to fill with effect for the party.

Every instinct of mine would indicate that I was meant to a dyed-in-the-wool Tory, or even a Bishop, rather than the leader of a revolution..."

Would have been better all around, Mr de Valera, had you followed your instincts...

==========================







BEIR BUA...

The Thread of the Irish Republican Movement from The United Irishmen through to today.

Republicanism in history and today.

Published by the James Connolly/Tommy O'Neill Cumann, Republican Sinn Féin, The Liberties, Dublin.

August 1998.

('1169' comment - 'Beir Bua' translates as 'Grasp Victory' in the English language.)

REPUBLICANS AND THE STATE :

In a statement on July 25th, 1987, Thomas Maguire wrote -

"I refer to my statement, dated 22nd day of October, 1986, and I speak again, as the sole surviving Teachta Dála of the Second Dáil Éireann, and the sole surviving member of the Executive of the Second Dáil.

In that statement, I referred to my recognition in December, 1969, of the Provisional Army Council of the IRA, which had remained true to the Irish Republic, as the lawful Army of the Thirty-Two-County Irish Republic.

I also stated on 22nd October, 1986, that I did not recognise the legitimacy of an Army Council, styling itself 'the Council of the Irish Republican Army', which lent support to any person or organisation styling itself Sinn Féin, and prepared to enter the partition parliament of Leinster House.

I referred, as well, to the IRA Convention, which had taken place shortly before the 22nd October, 1986. The Executive of the IRA had, by a majority, oppopsed entering Leinster House..."

(MORE LATER.)



























On the 11th September, 1923, 'The London Times' newspaper wrote that 'Article 12' of the Treaty would result in a "considerable modification of the present boundary", a kite-flying exercise in support of other pro-British loyalists who were opposed to Westminster abandoning them, as they saw it, by the issue of partitioning Ulster ie for maintaining jurisdictional control over only six of Ulster's nine counties.

'Article 12' stated -

'If before the expiration of the said month, an address is presented to His Majesty by both Houses of the Parliament of Northern Ireland to that effect, the powers of the Parliament and Government of the Irish Free State shall no longer extend to Northern Ireland, and the provisions of the Government of Ireland Act., 1920 (including those relating to the Council of Ireland) shall, so far as they relate to Northern Ireland continue to be of full force and effect, and this instrument shall have effect subject to the necessary modifications.

Provided that if such an address is so presented a Commission consisting of three Persons, one to be appointed by the Government of the Irish Free State, one to be appointed by the Government of Northern Ireland and one who shall be Chairman to be appointed by the British Government shall determine in accordance with the wishes of the inhabitants, so far as may be compatible with economic and geographic conditions, the boundaries between Northern Ireland and the rest of Ireland, and for the purposes of the Government of Ireland Act, 1920, and of this instrument, the boundary of Northern Ireland shall be such as may be determined by such Commission.'

The reason the Free Staters 'reluctantly accepted' both of those paragraphs was because of the wording "...in accordance with the wishes of the inhabitants, so far as may be compatible with economic and geographic conditions, the boundaries between Northern Ireland and the rest of Ireland.." which, they professed to believe, meant that they could eventually vote the Six Counties out of existence!

This talking shop/kicker-of-cans-down-the-road commission continued to talk and kick cans until November 1925, when it announced it had completed its work and then released its final report, to great acclaim. Not.

Incidentally, on this date - the 11th September - in 1925, the Chairman of the Boundary Commission, Mr Justice Richard Feetham (a [pro-British] South African Supreme Court judge) issued a 'Chairman's Memorandum' in which he outlined what was described as "a very restrictive view of the Commission's work under Article 12.." ie 'we won't be changing it, never mind tweaking it. Take it as is or leave it...'

The Staters took it, and announced it as a victory!

We have wrote about that can-kicking enterprise before, and no doubt will refer to it in the future.

==========================

Thanks for the visit, and for reading!

Sharon and the team.